I can directly quote the fake words you made up and argued against. I seriously do not care about these arguments you make up for yourself to argue against.
I can sit here and say "do you even watch the games hur durr". It doesn't matter. I know I watched the games and I know my opinion on it. Two people can watch the same show and have a different opinion on it. You say you have watched the games, it's a meaningless thing to hammer in on. When I watch Hendricks play, I do not see a natural feel to his offensive game...and by that I mean I don't think he's capable of making instinctive plays when things go off script. He can play within the flow of a game when there aren't many decisions to make and you don't ask him to make creative plays for himself. He is someone that looks better in a structured game rather than pick up style game where there is no structure and you more or less have to make plays on your own, hence the "hooper gene" comment. I really don't think this is controversial because you have said similar things several times over. You can say he plays this way because it's what he's being asked to do. The other side of this coin is that he's being asked to do this because it keeps him in positions to succeed and he's too raw to expand his game.
If you don't consider to be that "feel for the game".....ok. There's not a dictionary definition of this stuff, but I do not intend to answer for a dumb *** interpretation that you made up for himself. Never did I mention this and1 stuff or having that "dawg" in him. You made that up on your own.
