I guess I was exactly right. A pure salary dump without any major compensation going either way.
You were right! Props man! We actually got rid of Gay too so that is a plus.
I guess I was exactly right. A pure salary dump without any major compensation going either way.
I wish I wasn't. I don't think this is a good trade for us. I guess Zanik and Ainge don't think we can do better with our capspace over the next few years...You were right! Props man! We actually got rid of Gay too so that is a plus.
You cannot advertise it for more than a year that you love the guy and pursue him at every trade deadline and then expect to get assets when his team finally decides to let him go. That's the reason I never thought we are getting anything for absorbing his contract. We've been linked to him for more than a year now. Any GM worth their position will not let you get both the player you seemingly want AND an asset for it.**** that. Jesus ****ing Christ. This is ****ing terrible.
I like this idea. We have the abilityAny interest in Vasilije Micic? Apparently he wants to play in the nba next year. I have only seen him on YouTube clips so not completely familiar with his game. Think he could play either guard position as he seems like a good passer and he shoots the **** out of the ball.
It would have to be a sign and trade with OKC.
Did he though?Yes and he comes with an asset.
Did he though?
Didn't age wellMy position if I'm the Jazz is that we have no need for John Collins. He's owed 25 per year over the next 3 years unless he decides to decline his option in the final year, which at this point seems unlikely.
We just drafted his doppelganger in the NBA draft at 9. Why would we want to create a potential barrier to minutes for Hendricks?
We have no desire to move Kelly Olynyk. We love him and he's a great culture guy and a better player for our team than John Collins.
So in light of all this you have to blow us away for taking him on in a straight dump. If you want KO, that will cost even more.
We will consider adding Sexton if you meet our pick demands.
Could have got rid of gay with a buyout or whatever though right?You were right! Props man! We actually got rid of Gay too so that is a plus.
I didn't see that in your posts in this thread regarding getting Collins.Yes, we got rid of Gay lol.
I didn't see that in your posts in this thread regarding getting Collins.
Seemed like you were saying we actually get an asset from them not give them gay.