What's new

Al Jefferson to Utah? ...Mark Stein's Twitter reports

His dip in production last year -- was that a result of the injury he suffered the year before, or was it because of sharing the frontcourt with Love?

Mostly sharing time with Love, who demanded touches and is arguably the best rebounder in the league.
 
I do not want Jefferson.

HOWEVER.

The Wolves do not want to take back salary according to the link. I really think the Jazz should play hardball. Tell them that the Boozer exception is quite valuable more so than 3 years of Al Jefferson at 42 million. Force the Wolves to give up their number one pick unprotected next year. If they're reluctant, make it so that the Jazz have the option to switch, at least letting Minnesota have a draft pick. I'm not sure if the Wolves have other team's picks in 2011. Take the best one.

If the Jazz can get a high draft pick out of taking Jefferson's bloated contract, I'd be more willing to accept him. He's not a C, though, at 6-10, but he'd have to play it with the Jazz.
 
This is against the Jazz code of only have White players on the team. I dont see this getting done.

Maybe they should get love instead.
 
I do not want Jefferson.

HOWEVER.

The Wolves do not want to take back salary according to the link. I really think the Jazz should play hardball. Tell them that the Boozer exception is quite valuable more so than 3 years of Al Jefferson at 42 million. Force the Wolves to give up their number one pick unprotected next year. If they're reluctant, make it so that the Jazz have the option to switch, at least letting Minnesota have a draft pick. I'm not sure if the Wolves have other team's picks in 2011. Take the best one.

If the Jazz can get a high draft pick out of taking Jefferson's bloated contract, I'd be more willing to accept him. He's not a C, though, at 6-10, but he'd have to play it with the Jazz.

That's not going to work. If the Wolves were deep into the tax threshold you might be able to put a gun to their heads, but I believe I read somewhere that they can stand pat and not pay the tax at this point. I think it's a matter of the Wolves wanting to shed Jefferson's salary simply because they have Love and now Beasley. I would offer the TPE plus the Memphis pick. I'm really not interested in going through the NY pick scenario again. Instead of sitting on a draft pick for 5 years hoping it pans out, use it to gain a known commodity in the here and now.
 
I don't think this is a move that will take us to the promised land, but it may be the best the Jazz can do. I would be happy with the move, I think in our system he would be better than Boozer. Nice to hear the Jazz doing something at least.
 
That's not going to work. If the Wolves were deep into the tax threshold you might be able to put a gun to their heads, but I believe I read somewhere that they can stand pat and not pay the tax at this point. I think it's a matter of the Wolves wanting to shed Jefferson's salary simply because they have Love and now Beasley. I would offer the TPE plus the Memphis pick. I'm really not interested in going through the NY pick scenario again. Instead of sitting on a draft pick for 5 years hoping it pans out, use it to gain a known commodity in the here and now.

If that is the case, than I would say no to taking on Jefferson. I don't think he's worth 3/42 AND a draft pick.
 
If he can play center - that's what the Jazz need. You use up the 13M exception, but Jefferson's better than Booze.

C - Jefferson, Fes, Okur
PF - Millsap, AK, Koufos
SF - Brewer, AK
SG - CJ, Brewer
PG - Deron, Shannon Brown?, Price

Did you forget about Hayward. If Hayward can't beat out Brewer than we are in trouble.
 
If that is the case, than I would say no to taking on Jefferson. I don't think he's worth 3/42 AND a draft pick.

We'll just have to agree to disagree. I'll give up a TPE and a draft pick that will most likely turn out to be nothing for a 25 year old big man who will almost assuredly average 20 and 10 for Utah.

Not only that, I think overall he may be more talented than Boozer, not to mention 4 years younger. Deron will probably notice that too and it certainly won't hurt our chances of retaining him. It blows me away that all Jazz fans want is to get younger/better/taller and an option comes along who in regards to Boozer is quite possibly better, is certainly younger and taller and over the next 3 years isn't any more expensive than Boozer will be for Chicago. Plus he seems much tougher than Booz. Even though he was fighting through an injury last year the guy still played something like 75 games.


I like him, I want him and I'm going to throw an internet tantrum if Utah doesn't get him.
 
Back
Top