I seriously watch in awe how everybody underrates Havlicek, one of the greatest shooters of all time.
I don't, that's why I had Pippen guarding him, and I think he'll do a great job, especially considering that neither Havlicek nor Hill shoots the 3 ball, Pippen can just play him for the drive.
So, you forget how I can easily put another NBA scoring champion into play, King. Kyrie is also a 3 point shootout champion. I can't understand how my team can't hit the 3 arguement. My team doesn't need 3 point shooting to score, but there are several players who can when needed. I think my team is more versetile than KKK's. And I have really elite players who can defend the paremeter with proven defense, so how do YOU score the 3? Havlicek, Frazier, Paul AND Igoudala! Are you kidding me?! My team can defend the ****!
So you're bringing Kyrie in to replace Havlicek/Hill in the starting lineup? The problem is Kyrie needs the ball in his hand to be effective and doesn't do well in spot-up situations. As an example, he only shoots 32% from spot up 3's last season.
https://www.fearthesword.com/2014/7/26/5939649/kyrie-irving-catch-and-shoot-jumper-cavaliers
The thing people ignore is the fact that Havlicek could score anywhere on the floor. Deadeye sharpshooter he was. The 3 line didn't exist when he played but he could easily have been Kyle Korver.
The fact still stands that he has never shot a 3 pointer in his life, and pairing him with Grant Hill who's a career 31.4% shooter is a bad combination, IMO.
Using this logic, none of us should've ever drafted any wing who played before the inception of the three point line.