[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
Ok, may be not as dominant but Shaq still has an edge though.
And Shaq couldn't defend the PnR worth a ****. Zo could. Where's the edge now? There's a reason John and Karl owned the Lakers during the 90s.
Ok, may be not as dominant but Shaq still has an edge though.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];892120 said:And Shaq couldn't defend the PnR worth a ****. Zo could. Where's the edge now? There's a reason John and Karl owned the Lakers during the 90s.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];892121 said:Is Spy supposed to send Dirk out to defend the PnR?
WC's team is a nightmare matchup for Spy's starters, IMO.
I don't think it's quite the same, but it reminds me of the scene from Happy Gilmore.Alright bro, you win, I lose, you're right, I'm wrong, you're the best, I'm the worst.
(Rep for the first person guessing which movie that's from)
I don't think it's quite the same, but it reminds me of the scene from Happy Gilmore.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];892121 said:Is Spy supposed to send Dirk out to defend the PnR?
WC's team is a nightmare matchup for Spy's starters, IMO.
That didn't stop Shaq from winning three consecutive Finals MVP's (only player other than MJ to do it).
And if it did get out of hand, then McHale can play more minutes than anticipated. He was a great defender, while also being an incredible scorer. He's better than many of the bigs starting in this tournament.
#depth
Dirk < Malone
Shaq >>> Zo
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];892168 said:Shaq is obviously one of the all-time greats. I'm not saying he isn't. I just disagree with this:
It's more like:
Dirk <<< Malone
Shaq >> Zo
And besides, this whole contest should be about matchups, and there is no denying that your starters would be hugely vulnerable to WC's.