Why is it impossible?
Yes, something up in the sky could have a colder surface than down on the ocean. That's the point of insulation.
An Alleged 1953 UFO Crash and Burial Near Garrison, Utah
- Thread starter Archie Moses
- Start date
Why is it impossible?
Yes, something up in the sky could have a colder surface than down on the ocean. That's the point of insulation.
George Knapp and I almost certainly have one thing in common.
There was one settler of old Greenwich, Connecticut, circa 1630, with the name Knapp. Of the 15 men who signed the deal buying the land from the natives of the area, I am descended from 8 of them, in some cases more than one way. The Knapp name in America, along with names like Mead, Lockwood, Peet, are pretty much descended from that group.
So George Knapp and I are probably cousins, about 16 degrees removed, but in 100 different ways...... lol.
He still has his hair?????? It could have been a white mop, but that side of my family doesn't do bald much.
Descendants of "Old Goody Knapp", the last witch to be hanged in Greenwich. When the deed was done, one the community rushed the corpse and tore off the clothes to prove she didn't really have the tell-tale marks of the Devil on her body, shaming the crowd of accusers..... all my ancestors as well.....
I like George Knapp, but I am ashamed he is on that Crackpot to Crackpot radio show that lumps Globalist Cabals right in there with Remote Viewers, Witches, and Greys and whatnot. It's a sort of circus for the fabled ignorant masses that undermines any serious attempt to rationally develop public consensus based on truth.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
I'm not the expert. I'm just telling you what the experts think. No, not the armchair expert either.
I'm very disappointed in you this post. Usually you are one of the most perceptive and receptive people in this forum. You never just try to diss the truth, especially when it is perhaps reflective of inadequate qualified news reporting.
But how can you seriously dismiss the fantastic technology we have on board our military jets, and believe this contemptuous mockery of an officially released video. Of course our honchos would want us to believe their objectivity and truthfulness. I mean, could they possibly make up a video like this? I don't believe they can do magic, like, say, photoshop their own video, and superimpose some fake data on the "leaked" stuff to make it look fabulous. I mean, nobody but basement recluses know how to fake a video clip in any way.
And why would they want to make it look like a duck. That's racist ****.
No, the video is really a UFO. Well, to some it's a UFO. But not to me.
It is a low-altitude near miss event. You know, every now and they we have a meteor go by pretty close, and some hiker in Colorado at 13000 feet sees it zoom over the mountain he's on. Our intrepid fighter pilots actually filmed a sort of meteor. Not a rock from outer space, of course..... that would have looked pretty hot. And this was cold. Nope, it was a micro black hole. If it had actually hit the earth, we'd all be goners. So this is clearly one of the greatest near-extinction events in human history.
And so, of course, the government wants us to think it was a bird.
And the Deep State wants us to believe Fox News is just crap.
I know you will fully appreciate my analysis, and won't even do the obligatory crazed smiley on me.
The difference between being an expert, an armchair expert, and a reporter runs something like this.
The expert knows nothing.
The armchair expert knows where he is sitting.
The reporter is lying.
You mean, an expert in aviation technological capabilities, and a separate expert on the external temperatures that birds reach when flying at altitude, and not some armchair UFOlogist, right?
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Yeah, that guy. People who actually fly and use these technologies and/or witnessed them are the ones saying there's no way in hell it was a bird.
We don't do justice to the English language to use terms that miss the point so badly as UFO or UAP. "Unidentified" says more about human ignorance than anything else. What we need is a term that applies to the concept that it appears to be extraordinary somehow, or an intrusion into our world somehow.
EAP would be the good term...... extraordinary Aerial Phenomena", and with the term "IPE" or Intrusive Phenomena Event where the facts would appropriately raise that concern.
I sorta like the further terms FIPE when it's "Fake" or PIPE when it's "Political".
A further improvement in the explicit language would include "WIFE" for Witless Ignorant Fake Excitement". Not sure that acronym would evade the thorough torture of women's outrage possibly leading to my being tied to a horse and sent dragging down the highway..... But you get the idea.
"GIFT" is my final offering, for "Government Induced Fear Therapy".
The old wag "Cui Bono", or "Who does it benefit" drives the point here. Who really benefits from having a public living in ignorance and fear, scared witless with magical tales of unknown powers far beyond human capacity for resistance?
Yep, George Knapp and the whole Coast to Coast gang is likely just another of the plethora of globalist psy-ops dedicated to driving us all crazy, and making us feel like we need more and better government. WTH, why run a circus like CtoC????
Got something less than three hours long for that, and in particular, that refutes the details of the rebuttal video?
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Other than suggesting Gooogle I don't really care to search it for you.
Google is getting more and more worthless anyway.
I'm thinking I need to go to a library and find printed material that isn't actively being edited or cancelled for current political reasons.
I appreciate you posts above on this, even if I've sorta been trying to be a skeptic, for whatever reasons I can think of, off the top of my head.
I'd believe it's a duck though. Well, a goose more likely. The reasons not to believe that start with it being all alone, and flying really straight, and almost as fast as the jet.
I was listening to an astronomer talking about micro-sized black holes just yesterday, but considering that a black hole the size of a grapefruit would still have ten times the mass of the earth, it's certain it was not a black hole doing that trajectory, that near the earth. I mean, the planes would've been suck right into it. Stiff ;cars would've been sucked up into it. It'd be a super Hoover,