What's new
By:

Another Boozer trade Rumor(I actually like it)

Kenwood said:
Carter's contract isn't horrible length-wise, but he makes way too much. He's at $17.3M next year with a team option at $18M the year after. So he's actually a potential expiring contract.

But the trade as posted above doesn't come close to working. The Jazz would have to send $22M+ to take back $27.6M on those three players. Boozer can only make ~$17M or so, so who else would the Jazz send to make this deal work?
Click to expand...

Harpring's trade exception? I dunno how this **** works.
 
Mambo said:
crybaby.jpg
Click to expand...

Are you not seeing the irony here, my friend?
 
You do realize NBA players have salaries right? The incoming salaries of VC, Gortat and Bass are over $27.6 million and would put us $18 million over the tax obviously w/out resigning Matthews, Fesenko and Gaines.

But hey, if it means paying the luxury tax to get a soft 33-year old SG who disappears in the playoffs then I'm sure that's a risk the Jazz are willing to take.
 
Mambo said:
Sam Bowie was the consensus for that pick by the NBA. You act like I care honestly? The Jazz are my favorite team.

Im just saying you need to stop getting butthurt giving our fans a bad name.
Click to expand...

No. I would fully expect Blazer fans to dog me on their board too if I rocked a Jazz avatar.
 
honz said:
Agreed. I think he would really step his game up if we gave him a nice new contract as incentive to play hard for us.
Click to expand...

If any player needs money to play hard then I do not want him on the team. I doubt this deal has any validity because the Jazz are not going to take on more luxury $$$$ in order to do this deal. The Magic would have to give some draft picks to the Jazz to even think about doing this deal.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top