What's new
By:

Another Murder by Police in Pasquotank County, North Carolina

idestroyedthetoilet said:
That's quite the change of position from your earlier declaration.

"Nevertheless, they shot him in the back of the head. No, he never threatened them; he never even looked back at them. Nevertheless, they executed him."

Taking a reasonable approach like Beer and One Brow will help you to not look like a rash clown in the future.
Click to expand...
I was basing that on what the family said, and they did see a small portion of the video. But as we all agree, we need to see all the video(s). Also, I reported this before the judge decided against releasing the video. I think the state attorney-general or the Governor should step in and overrule the judge. It makes the police look bad when they refuse to release the video.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
I was basing that on what the family said, and they did see a small portion of the video. But as we all agree, we need to see all the video(s). Also, I reported this before the judge decided against releasing the video. I think the state attorney-general or the Governor should step in and overrule the judge. It makes the police look bad when they refuse to release the video.
Click to expand...
I disagree with overruling judges that are making rulings fully within their authority. Absolutely opposed to doing it for political purposes or really any purpose unless that particular judge is acting in a clearly unethical, illegal or inappropriate way.
 
Gameface said:
I disagree with overruling judges that are making rulings fully within their authority. Absolutely opposed to doing it for political purposes or really any purpose unless that particular judge is acting in a clearly unethical, illegal or inappropriate way.
Click to expand...
I agree.
 
Gameface said:
I disagree with overruling judges that are making rulings fully within their authority. Absolutely opposed to doing it for political purposes or really any purpose unless that particular judge is acting in a clearly unethical, illegal or inappropriate way.
Click to expand...
So, how do you know the judge is not doing it for political purposes or acting unethically. Just because what he is doing is legal doesn't mean it's ethical.
 
Gameface said:
I used the word "clearly"...

Do we need a user named "read4you" to step in?
Click to expand...
Do you really think it's not clear that the judge was not acting ethically after watching the more recent videos? He was covering up for the police, just like the prosecutor. I don't understand why the Governor or State AG can't step in and overrule the judge. In any case, the FBI has started an investigation. There's no doubt that the police need to be charged. They shot the guy in the back of the head when he was moving away from them and was no threat to their lives.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Do you really think it's not clear that the judge was not acting ethically after watching the more recent videos?
Click to expand...
I haven't seen the more recent videos...

But that's not what's interesting to me about this post.

You're seriously asking if I "really think" something is not clear because after I said that some new videos came out. Videos that were NOT out when I wrote that. Videos I haven't seen. I was never all that knowledgeable about the particular case you're talking about. I was speaking in general terms.

So listen carefully and/or get someone to read4you.

I don't think that when judges makes rulings that are in their authority to make, that political bodies should be overturning those rulings unless there is clear evidence of misconduct.

If in this case you're worked up about there is clear evidence of misconduct then go ahead and read my statement again (or have an adult read it for you).
 
Okay, that out of the way. I haven't seen the new videos. But as they were described it sounded to me like deadly force was justified.
 
Gameface said:
I used the word "clearly"...

Do we need a user named "read4you" to step in?
Click to expand...

Gameface said:
I haven't seen the more recent videos...

But that's not what's interesting to me about this post.

You're seriously asking if I "really think" something is not clear because after I said that some new videos came out. Videos that were NOT out when I wrote that. Videos I haven't seen. I was never all that knowledgeable about the particular case you're talking about. I was speaking in general terms.

So listen carefully and/or get someone to read4you.

I don't think that when judges makes rulings that are in their authority to make, that political bodies should be overturning those rulings unless there is clear evidence of misconduct.

If in this case you're worked up about there is clear evidence of misconduct then go ahead and read my statement again (or have an adult read it for you).
Click to expand...
Listen, GF, the judge I'm sure saw the damn videos. The family had seen a snippet. We knew he got shot in the back of the head. It was not in the best interests of justice not to release them just because there's a law that says he can. To me it's blatantly obvious he was doing something unethical. And I reported you for constantly harassing me.
 
Eenie-Meenie said:
Listen, GF, the judge I'm sure saw the damn videos. The family had seen a snippet. We knew he got shot in the back of the head. It was not in the best interests of justice not to release them just because there's a law that says he can. To me it's blatantly obvious he was doing something unethical. And I reported you for constantly harassing me.
Click to expand...
By responding to you?

Okay that's cool, I'll just throw you on the ignore list. lol
 
Gameface said:
Okay, that out of the way. I haven't seen the new videos. But as they were described it sounded to me like deadly force was justified.
Click to expand...
Deadly force is only justified if the life of the law enforcement officer is in danger. In this case, he got shot in the back of the head and they were not in danger when they shot him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top