What's new

Apparently Danny Ange didn’t know he was helping the Lakers get Luka Dončić

Of course it's ethical. The Jazz got 2 seconds for 55k and taking on a player they reportedly have had past interest in. The Lakers/Mavs dont owe them any kind of information about what else was going on. You want in or not?
 
Of course it's ethical. The Jazz got 2 seconds for 55k and taking on a player they reportedly have had past interest in. The Lakers/Mavs dont owe them any kind of information about what else was going on. You want in or not?
Your probably right but I hate the lakers, so to play devils advocate, if the lakers didn’t say something because they thought DA wouldn’t have helped isn’t that unethical?
 
Didn't the Dallas GM said some stupid **** like credit to Pelinka for keeping a secret? Yeah no ****. You would have like 10+ plus teams jump in and outbid the Lakers to hijack the deal if Pelinka didn't keep his mouth shut. What an idiot.
 
They don’t need to disclose anything about the whole deal. Just like I wouldn’t want Ainge to disclose extra details if/when he goes big game hunting. You go get your guy - period. Jazz are in asset acquisition mode, and just happened to be in on the part of the deal that ate up cap space and brought in a young prospect they like. If you don’t want to help the Lakers (or T-Wolves) then stop taking their effing calls.
 
Is this trade two small steps forward and one giant leap back? Ergo, is the amount the ‘27 Lakers pick devaluation smaller or larger than the added value of JHS and two second round picks that may not be on our roster next year or whose value our runway is too time limited to appropriately squeeze?
 
Is this trade two small steps forward and one giant leap back? Ergo, is the amount the ‘27 Lakers pick devaluation smaller or larger than the added value of JHS and two second round picks that may not be on our roster next year or whose value our runway is too time limited to appropriately squeeze?
It depends on Luka's calorie intake between now and then.
 
Is this trade two small steps forward and one giant leap back? Ergo, is the amount the ‘27 Lakers pick devaluation smaller or larger than the added value of JHS and two second round picks that may not be on our roster next year or whose value our runway is too time limited to appropriately squeeze?
Maybe ultimately. But the deal 100% was happening with or without the Jazz. It's not like JHS getting dumped to a team was going to hold it up.
 
Back
Top