I think you have to question the use of the word "unambiguously," in the punch line. The writer starts out with the premise that vaccines aren't a money-maker but that in recent years they have become so. My point is that people need to use caution, number one; and two, there are intelligent voices out there who have done a lot more research on this than you or I and have no financial investment in this issue who are raising concerns. I keep harping on this point of money being involved. In fact, money is the big issue in the treatment of cancer, the trillions of dollars invested in conventional treatment, which is preventing research into herbal remedies that show promise without the horrid side effects. The Pharmaceutical industry is the richest in the world and in the U.S. its prices are not regulated. That should make you stop and think. Maybe my concerns about vaccines are unfounded; maybe they are "unambiguously" safe -- if you note, any one of us could've written that article. It was only as good as her sources; she is not a researcher or expert in this field. But I think we ought to make sure that's true and not listen to the pharmaceutical companies who don't care about people's health and only about their bottomline. Listen to the naysayers, give them the right to speak, and if the evidence shows they are wrong, then we can move on.