J
JAZZGASM
Guest
50-47 isn't getting out-rebounded thoroughly. your correct. I'd argue the discrepancy was enough to affect the games outcome though, most can agree the Jazz need to win the rebounding differential decisively to be most effective.. I mentioned it during the game, in the game thread. Didn't post that after examining the box-scores, obviously.
There's standard variety rebounds, that I like to (and many others) like to call In-area rebounds, and then there's out-of-area rebounds that hustle players(often with long arms)grab.. The Jazz with Favors and Gobert are outstanding at limiting teams out-of-area rebounds that are around the rim, so when teams are doing that - It's a problem.... I thought in that 1st preseason game, with the starters, the Blazers were grabbing too many out-of-area rebounds, particularly Ed Davis.
Same as the preseason game vs OKC - Steven Adams was grabbng too many out-of-area boards, It's really not a big deal, it's not an indicator - just one of those things I like to keep an eye on.
You mentioned it is this thread, TODAY and you clearly referenced the last preseason game when we didn't even have starters playing (it is the preseason anyway, not a great indicator by any means, but especially when we have three starters out). The rebounding did not make the difference. The difference was when we were up by 20+ with over a quarter remaining Snyder gave some love to the scrubs who were about to get cut. Portland played their starters for the rest of the game and we lost, period.
So seriously, WTF are you talking about and what exactly are you keeping an eye on? Clearly you don't know, and from your logic, or lack thereof it is not surprising. Please, please, please---just stop.