What's new

Backup 4/5 solution: Emmanuel Mudiay?

I know you say that Bradley shouldn't get any minutes in these matchups, and I agree, but it raises a bit of the assumption that perhaps he's somehow more playable against someone like LAL. I mean, maybe if he's covering Dwight, but what if it's AD out there are the big man? I'm afraid we'll go to that as the default just because of size.

We really need Ekpe.
Ha... you right. If Boban comes in then TB might be the guy
 
I try to avoid strong condemnations of the FO and coaching staff (for no other reason than I just know so little in comparison to them), but I’ll go out in the record and say that if we don’t see some serious experimentation with Morgan and/or Brantley in REAL GAMES, then they’ll have played all of this way too conservatively. Case closed.

and sign Epke ffs.
 
I try to avoid strong condemnations of the FO and coaching staff (for no other reason than I just know so little in comparison to them), but I’ll go out in the record and say that if we don’t see some serious experimentation with Morgan and/or Brantley in REAL GAMES, then they’ll have played all of this way too conservatively. Case closed.

and sign Epke ffs.

So I do think there are times when you can't see the forest because you are standing in the trees. I have a bunch of people that come to me with business stuff... I know very little about their industries... sometimes I ask a few questions or give a general direction they did not think about and it solves their issue. Its simple stuff and self diagnose... like talking it out loud but it works.

The other day my father in law had a few real estate deals in the air and asked my opinion on something... I know almost nothing about development. I asked a couple questions after talking through it and we came up with a pretty good solution.

So just because we aren't in practice and know everything doesn't mean you are wrong... sometimes the perspective is helpful. We are dumb AF but doesn't mean some of this stuff is wrong.
 
So I do think there are times when you can't see the forest because you are standing in the trees. I have a bunch of people that come to me with business stuff... I know very little about their industries... sometimes I ask a few questions or give a general direction they did not think about and it solves their issue. Its simple stuff and self diagnose... like talking it out loud but it works.

The other day my father in law had a few real estate deals in the air and asked my opinion on something... I know almost nothing about development. I asked a couple questions after talking through it and we came up with a pretty good solution.

So just because we aren't in practice and know everything doesn't mean you are wrong... sometimes the perspective is helpful. We are dumb AF but doesn't mean some of this stuff is wrong.
For sure. And, like you, I’m sorta in the business of generating good questions—so I get it. Still... this business with Morgan and Brantley seems so ****ing obvious that I’m thrown off.
 
So I do think there are times when you can't see the forest because you are standing in the trees. I have a bunch of people that come to me with business stuff... I know very little about their industries... sometimes I ask a few questions or give a general direction they did not think about and it solves their issue. Its simple stuff and self diagnose... like talking it out loud but it works.

The other day my father in law had a few real estate deals in the air and asked my opinion on something... I know almost nothing about development. I asked a couple questions after talking through it and we came up with a pretty good solution.

So just because we aren't in practice and know everything doesn't mean you are wrong... sometimes the perspective is helpful. We are dumb AF but doesn't mean some of this stuff is wrong.
GMs would out preform us in the aggregate. But I think people confuse these issues because they look at the micro and the macro as being the exact same thing, so you get lots of "you think you're smarter than the GM lololol" comments. I mean, I'm a professional at what I do. The knowledge gap between myself in my profession and the lay person is enormous. I wouldn't just out preform others if they did my job. They simply couldn't do my job. At all. However, that doesn't mean that any given individual can't out preform me on small, isolated decisions. It could happen. Not infrequently. That's what gets so lost on all this commentary. Because somebody is a GM means that all the micro stuff is infallible because the macro is good. It's like being able to win a possession vs. winning a game, and thinking they're the exact same thing. Hell, we criticize players all the time and their decisions, with very rare "they're professionals and you're an arm chair quarter back lolzers!!!1," yet somehow executives get this huge pass.

Rant over.
 
GMs would out preform us in the aggregate. But I think people confuse these issues because they look at the micro and the macro as being the exact same thing, so you get lots of "you think you're smarter than the GM lololol" comments. I mean, I'm a professional at what I do. The knowledge gap between myself in my profession and the lay person is enormous. I wouldn't just out preform others if they did my job. They simply couldn't do my job. At all. However, that doesn't mean that any given individual can't out preform me on small, isolated decisions. It could happen. Not infrequently. That's what gets so lost on all this commentary. Because somebody is a GM means that all the micro stuff is infallible because the macro is good. It's like being able to win a possession vs. winning a game, and thinking they're the exact same thing. Hell, we criticize players all the time and their decisions, with very rare "they're professionals and you're an arm chair quarter back lolzers!!!1," yet somehow executives get this huge pass.

Rant over.

I have told people in Sacramento that I think I'd likely be a poor to average GM, but that I could out perform Vlade by just not ****ing up the huge things.
 
Okay, so the thread title is a bit misleading. But most teams have gone small, and even if they haven't, many of us have been saying what a defensive liability the backup 5 is and will be now and especially come playoff time. We're starting to run Morgan out there, which is great and I hope it continues, and even Royce playing Rudy's role on defense. So that raises a few questions/observations. One is that Royce has been struggling more lately on quicker guards on the perimeter. In some backup lineups, does it make sense to move him up playing the 4/5 while we open up time for Mudiay? Moving Royce up even as a small-ball 5 really opens up our minutes to clear out the guard log-jam and allows us to replace more of Niang's minutes with Mudiay. Mudiay already is a better rebounder, grabbing more per minute and posting a higher rebounding %, which I would honesty expect to go up just by vacuum effect if he were out there as the 3/4 sometimes. His defense is better than Niang and he's a lot stronger. His ability to iso may be more valuable come playoff time.

Overall, I think this can improve defense and have more well-rounded play the more we integrate Mudiay/Morgan and minimize others. This doesn't work against LA. I'm still very much in favor of signing Udoh, but this is a good option using what we have. If we did sign Udoh, then FTW make Mudiay our backup 3/4 and have to take Niang out of rotation.
I'd rather Mudiay get minutes than Niang. Right now Niang is a problem unless he's hitting. And even then I wonder if Mudiay isn't a better option.
 
I try to avoid strong condemnations of the FO and coaching staff (for no other reason than I just know so little in comparison to them), but I’ll go out in the record and say that if we don’t see some serious experimentation with Morgan and/or Brantley in REAL GAMES, then they’ll have played all of this way too conservatively. Case closed.

and sign Epke ffs.

****ing *thank you*! IT MAKES NO ****ING SENSE!
 
I swear I'm thinking we should run O'neale/Niang/Clarkson/Mudiay + DM or Conley as our bench unit. At least against teams who try to go small against us.

Why not? Because we'll give up the rim? We do that already when Rudy sits.

Why not 5 Out and really put pressure on defenses? At the very least we'll score enough to prevent other teams from going on those 15-2 type of runs.

Mudiay is a better basketball player than Davis, Bradley or Morgan
 
I swear I'm thinking we should run O'neale/Niang/Clarkson/Mudiay + DM or Conley as our bench unit. At least against teams who try to go small against us.

Why not? Because we'll give up the rim? We do that already when Rudy sits.

Why not 5 Out and really put pressure on defenses? At the very least we'll score enough to prevent other teams from going on those 15-2 type of runs.

Mudiay is a better basketball player than Davis, Bradley or Morgan
This is without a doubt what we should do against the Rox. Can someone snap Q out of his slump, pls?
 
Back
Top