My two bits.....
Ben Shapiro is a much-needed articulate spokesman for a lot of people who are just fed up with the standard fare of propaganda that prevails today. Pretty sure any good beliefs will be re-formatted somehow in response to really well-thought out intelligent challenge.
hey, I hear a lot of people think that the State of Israel should be abolished. Some countries like Iran even consider the United States should be replaced with a Caliphate. huh? So what's with the libs who are all about embracing diversity and don't feel any need to re-educated people committed to such ideals?
fact is, the average Joe getting a blip or two off the radio talk shows' " bomb-throwing" hosts might have rational concerns about the continuity of the American Experiment. Pretty sure a lot of Israeli citizens have rational concerns about their security. What we gonna do? round up the dumbass American patriots and re-educate them. Really???? It's just a mark of stupidity that you think of a Hannity as a "bomb-thrower". Just because you have no actually decent or intelligent response to things he says, or just because the wheels have fallen off the Progressive wagon. All I've seen so far is pretty low-level assertions from "fact-check" propaganda support sites which I find incredibly uninformed and unintelligent, actually. I think Hannity has been willing to go on air with stuff that had real sources and at least some basis generally. He's more of a reporter/journalist even while being an opinion purveyor than some of our supposedly "dedicated, objective" professing news outlets.
But if Sean Hannity is IQ 115 or so, Shapiro is a much higher level debater and analyst. Yes, he talks like a lawyer, and crafts his arguments with the same dedicated all-out advocacy, but he is prepared to dress them out in detail to all comers. I find him civil to his critics, and he does not stand on ideology like say Ayn Rand or any brand of American nationalist/patriot. He stands on his reasoning. He is deliberate in his stand, intending to challenge the conventional chatter du jour.
If you're a progressive or idealistic wonk in favor of some better world for mankind, you just need to step up to the plate and deal with the pitch.
Pretty stupid of people like Hillary broadsiding a majority of American citizens calling them "deplorables", and in fact pretty stupid of the brave new world pushers in here not noticing that their audience is shrinking.
Basketball fans aren't know for being particularly liberal, nor are Utahns generally, and maybe it'd be a little smarter, in missionary lingo, to mix with the natives a little and let them know you're human, too.
It takes a Hillary to make a Trump President. If you've got good ideas, you'd better articulate them in some kind of good manners.
Ben Shapiro is a much-needed articulate spokesman for a lot of people who are just fed up with the standard fare of propaganda that prevails today. Pretty sure any good beliefs will be re-formatted somehow in response to really well-thought out intelligent challenge.
hey, I hear a lot of people think that the State of Israel should be abolished. Some countries like Iran even consider the United States should be replaced with a Caliphate. huh? So what's with the libs who are all about embracing diversity and don't feel any need to re-educated people committed to such ideals?
fact is, the average Joe getting a blip or two off the radio talk shows' " bomb-throwing" hosts might have rational concerns about the continuity of the American Experiment. Pretty sure a lot of Israeli citizens have rational concerns about their security. What we gonna do? round up the dumbass American patriots and re-educate them. Really???? It's just a mark of stupidity that you think of a Hannity as a "bomb-thrower". Just because you have no actually decent or intelligent response to things he says, or just because the wheels have fallen off the Progressive wagon. All I've seen so far is pretty low-level assertions from "fact-check" propaganda support sites which I find incredibly uninformed and unintelligent, actually. I think Hannity has been willing to go on air with stuff that had real sources and at least some basis generally. He's more of a reporter/journalist even while being an opinion purveyor than some of our supposedly "dedicated, objective" professing news outlets.
But if Sean Hannity is IQ 115 or so, Shapiro is a much higher level debater and analyst. Yes, he talks like a lawyer, and crafts his arguments with the same dedicated all-out advocacy, but he is prepared to dress them out in detail to all comers. I find him civil to his critics, and he does not stand on ideology like say Ayn Rand or any brand of American nationalist/patriot. He stands on his reasoning. He is deliberate in his stand, intending to challenge the conventional chatter du jour.
If you're a progressive or idealistic wonk in favor of some better world for mankind, you just need to step up to the plate and deal with the pitch.
Pretty stupid of people like Hillary broadsiding a majority of American citizens calling them "deplorables", and in fact pretty stupid of the brave new world pushers in here not noticing that their audience is shrinking.
Basketball fans aren't know for being particularly liberal, nor are Utahns generally, and maybe it'd be a little smarter, in missionary lingo, to mix with the natives a little and let them know you're human, too.
It takes a Hillary to make a Trump President. If you've got good ideas, you'd better articulate them in some kind of good manners.
