What's new

Boston Marathon explosions......

You are making the elementary mistake that correlation equates to causation. Dealing with the paradox of the plenty right after imperialism isn't as easy as you make it out to be.

Yes, I'm making the mistake of correlating terrorism by Muslims with Islam. Good one. And what Imperialism? Are you saying that because parts of the Muslims world were occupied for a few years within their millennium of ****, they're blowing up tourists and conducting a world-wide campaign of terror? Ya, tell that to the Indians who must live in fear because the plague happened to infect 20% of their population, putting the other 80% in serious danger. Or to the Saudis who treat their women worse than non-savages treat their pets, despite not having been occupied by anyone ever.

But hey, at least you're trying to find justifications. Many Muslims consider sending children to blow up a synagogue a holy endeavor of the noblest kind.
 
Last edited:
Yes, I'm making the mistake of correlating terrorism by Muslims with Islam. Good one. And what Imperialism? Are you saying that because parts of the Muslims world was occupied for a few years within their millennium of ****, they're blowing up tourists and conducting a world-wide campaign of terror? Ya, tell that to the Indians who must live in fear because the plague happened to infect 20% of their population, putting the other 80% in serious danger. Or to the Saudis who treat their women worse than non-savages treat their pets, despite not having been occupied by anyone ever.

But hey, at least you're trying to find justifications. Many Muslims consider sending children to blow up a synagogue a holy endeavor of the noblest kind.

Ya lets only use the Muslim world that just went through a century of imperialism and have resource curse to judge Islam. I am a rational man so I cannot agree with you. Also you never gave a defense of why causation equals correlation. You do blatant cherrypicking when choosing who the judge islam by.
 
Last edited:
It's amusing when people engage TBS. I've had more productive discussions with chat bots.

What is funny is that you said this. Then engaged TBS in discussion. Haha, what are youthinking?
 
Ya lets only use the Muslim world that just went through a century of imperialism and have resource curse to judge Islam. I am a rational man so I cannot agree with you. Also you never gave a defense of why causation equals correlation.

Do you even know what you're talking about? Or do you just copy what you read on your Muslim radicals forums without any understanding?

When Muslims carry out an act of terror, then release a video bragging about it, and quoting justifications from Quran, while Islamic banners hang behind them, no statistical investigations are needed. How can something so simple be so incomprehensible to you? Do you just spout that statement about causation because you think it makes you sound smart?

And what about imperialism and resource discovery? According to your logic, if you're occupied for a bit, you turn into a terrorist for a century. You find oil in your country, it's terrorism time. Your *** itches? Perhaps you should give terrorism a try. What kind of nonsense is that? And yes I am judging your religion by what it has done this century. I'm concerned about the real world and it's people, not some romanticized fantasy of the short-lived glory of an ancient empire.
 
Please provide evidence that if Osama Bin Laden had been an other religion he would be less violent.

Since I'm not sure that's true, why would I argue for that position? I don't know enough to separate out the effects of religion, other aspects of Middle-Eastern culture, family issues, personal demons, etc. to make such a claim. I'm not sure anyone does.

In regards to Hitler not only was it his personal secretory Martin Bormann himself but all of close advisers and personal letters state this. It is all in a book which is the largest collection of Hitlers personal letters and conversations called "Hitlers Table Talk." You can find it here https://archive.org/stream/HitlersTableTalk/HitlersTableTalk_djvu.txt. Just do a control find and type religion and you can see countless areas he is hostile towards religion.

Hostility toward clerics is not the same as hostility towards religion, or being an atheist. For example, the wiki article does not mention atheism at all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler's_Table_Talk

By the way, here's a quote from your link:

THE NATURE OF GOD

nature will guide us on the path of progress. As for the why of these laws, we shall never know anything about it. A thing is so, and our understanding cannot conceive of other schemes.

Man has discovered in nature the wonderful notion of that all-mighty being whose law he worships.

Fundamentally in everyone there is the feeling for this all-mighty, which we call God (that is to say, the dominion of natural laws throughout the whole universe). The priests, who have always succeeded in exploiting this feehng, threaten punishments for the man who refuses to accept the creed they impose.

When one provokes in a child a fear of the dark, one awakens in him a feeling of atavistic dread. Thus this child will be ruled
all his life by this dread, whereas another child, who has been intelligently brought up, will be free of it.

It's said that every man needs a refuge where he can find consolation and help in unhappiness. I don't believe it! If humanity follows that path, it's solely a matter of tradition and habit. That's a lesson, by the way, that can be drawn from the
Bolshevik front. The Russians have no God, and that doesn't prevent them from being able to face death.

We don't want to educate anyone in atheism.
 
Do you even know what you're talking about? Or do you just copy what you read on your Muslim radicals forums without any understanding?

When Muslims carry out an act of terror, then release a video bragging about it, and quoting justifications from Quran, while Islamic banners hang behind them, no statistical investigations are needed. How can something so simple be so incomprehensible to you? Do you just spout that statement about causation because you think it makes you sound smart?

And what about imperialism and resource discovery? According to your logic, if you're occupied for a bit, you turn into a terrorist for a century. You find oil in your country, it's terrorism time. Your *** itches? Perhaps you should give terrorism a try. What kind of nonsense is that? And yes I am judging your religion by what it has done this century. I'm concerned about the real world and it's people, not some romanticized fantasy of the short-lived glory of an ancient empire.

You're cherry picking the black sheep of the Muslim community and marketing them as exemplary Muslims. I can tell you are an avid fan of fox news. After you have been defeated in debate you resort to making remarks like *** itching, personal insults, and straw man.
 
You're cherry picking the black sheep of the Muslim community and marketing them as exemplary Muslims. I can tell you are an avid fan of fox news.

Holy ****. You're becoming more idiotic by the second. Is your brain leaking into your nasty unkempt beard? The black sheep who are almost entirely Muslim, and who have been terrorizing the entire world for a long time with no end in sight. Who gives a flying **** about your personal feelings on Islam? Fact is, modern Islam has strong tendency to create terrorists. Even when it doesn't, it ensures every society it touches turns to ****. I don't want this society to contract the disease, and thus I consider it the greatest threat to modern civilization.

Now you haven't responded to a single thing I said, while I responded to the simple-mindedness that you continue to parrot. If you have nothing to contribute to the debate, and I suspect you don't since I'm asking you to think and not to murder innocents, I will take my leave.
 
Holy ****. You're becoming more idiotic by the second. Is your brain leaking into your nasty unkempt beard? The black sheep who are almost entirely Muslim, and who have been terrorizing the entire world for a long time with no end in sight. Who gives a flying **** about your personal feelings on Islam? Fact is, modern Islam has strong tendency to create terrorists. Even when it doesn't, it ensures every society it touches turns to ****. I don't want this society to contract the disease, and thus I consider it the greatest threat to modern civilization.

Now you haven't responded to a single thing I said, while I responded to the simple-mindedness that you continue to parrot. If you have nothing to contribute to the debate, and I suspect you don't since I'm asking you to think and not to murder innocents, I will take my leave.

All you said were personal insults and ad hominem, how else you want me to respond to it? You judge 1.4 billion people on the actions of less than .01% of the population. I already linked you a harvard paper showing that Muslims have less violence than Christians. You link no sources, all opinion based rant that was probably ripped straight out of fox news.
 
All you said were personal insults and ad hominem, how else you want me to respond to it? You judge 1.4 billion people on the actions of less than .01% of the population. I already linked you a harvard paper showing that Muslims have less violence than Christians. You link no sources, all opinion based rant that was probably ripped straight out of fox news.

How about proving how Muslim societies are flourishing and thriving?

As for that .01% That is a very weighted percent when they are often the leaders...
 
Back
Top