What's new
By:

Chad Ford has us taking Exum at #5.

Core4 said:
He's not a consensus top-4 player...at least if the "consensus" includes Dennis Lindsey, or some of the others who now say Vonleh is sneaking into that top group. DL said in an interview there is a top-3. Pretty sure he meant Embiid, Parker and Wiggins in that group; I don't see how else it could be interpreted. And if Exum can't play PG, I wouldn't be excited over having him be the pick. Jazz will likely re-sign Hayward and already have another helluva good SG in Burks, so the 2 is covered. If the margin between players is very small, which I think it is with Vonleh, Exum and Gordon, then you have to consider need. Gordon at SF is the best from a pure need standpoint. Vonleh fits because the Favors and Gobert can play the 5, leaving Vonleh to develop behind Enes at PF.
Click to expand...

This is exactly what someone should say if they are worried their guy will be gone. "I SURE hope one of you guys don't take VONLEH. I think he is super swell. If we luck out and VONLEH is available we are taking him. So please don't pick him before us. "
 
I like Exum as a high-ceiling pick. If he busts, so what. At least we took a chance on a potential star. It's not like we are getting a star here via free agency.
 
Batman said:
My Big Board looks like this right now:
1- Embiid (if Healthy)
2- Parker
3- Wiggins
4- Vonleh
5- Exum
6- Smart
7- Gordon
8-Randle
Click to expand...
What the hell is wrong with you!! It's my god given right to hate you!! I should report you for flirting with me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top