Somebody care to explain this fawning nurses nonsense, and why a quick search only pulls up NAOS posts dating all the way back to January where he continues to be the only one continually repeating this?
Somebody care to explain this fawning nurses nonsense, and why a quick search only pulls up NAOS posts dating all the way back to January where he continues to be the only one continually repeating this?
You went all the way back to January??
The origins are much older.
it happened.
Nickel, please. I'm 32, didn't go to college, and make plenty of money. I've survived by the skin of my teeth at times, but made it to at least a reasonable amount of success. At my job Doctors, both Ph.D and MD speak my [name] in reverence knowing full well I don't have a degree. I work my butt off, and they reap the benefits of having me around. They market studies that get published, and can then charge more for their services. The warning systems and alerts I set up benefit them, and our patient's safety.
I don't need to go to college, as I'm proof that if you work hard enough at an institution managers will bend over backwards to flex around HR rules to get you hired. I still support reform. I don't need Obamacare, as my job provides me great insurance. I still support it. I took charge of my life; did damn well. And yet I recognize need for these things.
And yet you still fail to acknowledge the point I tried to make. A point that even the most daft of my nurses would have grasped.
Thanks [MENTION=40]Siro[/MENTION].
Hmm interesting. Well not really but there it is I guess. The whole "with reverence" thing smacks of narcissistic hyperbole, but for the most part pretty benign. I call my managers and supervisors my managers and supervisors, since they work for me, so the "my nurses" comment isn't weird at all unless you are specifically looking at it through some lens that twists it that way. On the whole a pretty lame thing to harp on really. Now the whole "most daft" part is pretty sexist in combination, but still I assume it was a response to likely an equally dumb comment so it still doesn't really even ping the "top 3 worst posts ever" meter, or whatever it was claimed to be.
Admittedly I didn't read the threads. My tolerance levels for boredom and banality only go so far.
The purpose is to keep alive one of the top-3 most ridiculous things ever said on this website. And that's a valid purpose. Thanks for your part-time policing work around here, doe.
But...why? Why keep it alive?
Other than to be a douche, that is. You're such a tool.