Circumcision ?

[Deleted member 848]

lol. Lolololol.

Who has lead the world in science since the Second World War?

 

[Deleted member 848]

That was directed at AKMVP who says that pharmacological companies are stealing foreskins to make money.

Fingernails provides rigidity to the ends of nails. Go online look at the pros and cons at having nails then look at the same for foreskin. If you don't see a difference I cannot help you anymore.

Thanks for providing peer reviewed unbiased proof from a website called doctorsagainstcircumcision.com. I bet you get your opinion of homosexuals from godhatesfags.com.

Lmao. TBS dishing the soft serve. One of his best performances in JF history.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Male circumcision isn't tragic, as it doesn't have a huge impact on the sexual experience, but it does have an effect.

With the aid of artificial lubrication circumcised men can regain the same ability to experience pleasurable sex (solo or partnered) that uncircumcised men enjoy without the need for artificial lubrication.

Circumcision can be performed at any point. If a man wants it done he can have it done. If a baby has it done they cannot decide to not have it done. If there is a legitimate medical need that arises it can be done.


Obviously this is an emotional issue, especially for those who were circumcised at birth and who circumcised their sons at birth. One cannot know what it would have been like to be uncircumcised. One cannot give their sons their foreskin back.

I'm not going off stats here, but most people I know tend to recommend having it earlier-- both because it is less painful for babies, AND it has a lower chance of complications.

Again, not going off stats. But this sort of thought-process seems to be quite common. Of course, theres the issue of babies not having a choice for it; but the worry is that by the time you DO have the optio, often it means that the procedure will be much more painful, and have a higher potential for complications.




I'm circumcised, and I'm glad my parents did it. My dick looks great, yo.

 

[franklin]

Solo?

I suppose it could be better for some and have always taken your word on the benefits, but I obviously have no way to compare and can't figure how some more skin would be better and not worse. As for women, isn't the mushroom cap a stimulator?

 

[franklin]

So I just googled uncircumcised images to make sure I'm not misinterpreting things. I now know the Statue of David is uncircumcised. Based on that being the most beautiful piece of art ever produced, I am now in favor of not lopping the top. I just can't argue with Michelangelo's masterpiece.

 

[Gameface]

I suppose it could be better for some and have always taken your word on the benefits, but I obviously have no way to compare and can't figure how some more skin would be better and not worse. As for women, isn't the mushroom cap a stimulator?

I appreciate that we can have this discussion here. I've tried not to be too graphic or to be outright vulgar. A fairly descriptive explanation in the spoiler box.

Spoiler

I can't speak for all guys and have seen enough porn to know it isn't the same for everyone and I think maybe being a grower vs a shower might make a difference, but I'm not sure. So, all that said, my glans are not covered if I'm erect unless the skin is pulled upwards (during removal). The visual difference is pretty minimal at that point. I know I can't post the gif, and it might be hard to conceptualize but the skin can remain somewhat stationary at the opening of a vagina while the head and the shaft move in and out, if that makes sense.

 

[♪alt13]

Samsonite is coming out with a wallet made of babies foreskins. When you rub it, it turns into a suitcase.

lmao

 

[MVP]

Who has lead the world in science since the Second World War?

We need to be more specific as science is very very wide field. But lets looks at just few things: Who went first to space? USSR. First heart transplant? Barnard in South Africa. First facial transplant - Spain, First mammal cloned? Scotland. So to say that USA is leading in science thus their doctors opinion and studies are more scientific then rest of the world is BS IMHO.
This article places USA in 3 place for innovations and technology for example.

https://www.theatlanticcities.com/t...eading-nations-innovation-and-technology/224/

 

[MVP]

"Paul Murray Fleiss, M.D. (born September 8, 1933)[1] is an American pediatrician and author known for his unconventional medical views."

I love his Wikipedia profile. Granted it is Wikipedia.

How about you look at your pro circumcision doctors profiles?

 

[MVP]

"Paul Murray Fleiss, M.D. (born September 8, 1933)[1] is an American pediatrician and author known for his unconventional medical views."

I love his Wikipedia profile. Granted it is Wikipedia.

Fleiss was described in the Los Angeles Times as "everyone's favorite baby doctor" and having been "one of Southern California's most sought-after physicians" for thirty years. Sometimes described in the media as a "pediatrician to the stars", he counts numerous celebrities or their children among his patients, including Leonardo DiCaprio, Madonna, Pamela Anderson, Harrison Ford, Robert De Niro, and Cindy Crawford.

Seems like pretty damn good doctor to me.

 

[franklin]

I appreciate that we can have this discussion here. I've tried not to be too graphic or to be outright vulgar. A fairly descriptive explanation in the spoiler box.

Spoiler

I can't speak for all guys and have seen enough porn to know it isn't the same for everyone and I think maybe being a grower vs a shower might make a difference, but I'm not sure. So, all that said, my glans are not covered if I'm erect unless the skin is pulled upwards (during removal). The visual difference is pretty minimal at that point. I know I can't post the gif, and it might be hard to conceptualize but the skin can remain somewhat stationary at the opening of a vagina while the head and the shaft move in and out, if that makes sense.

I kind of guessed it would be "unwrapped" while in the act as there's obviously a strong evolutionary advantage provided by the stimulation, but I've always pictured it more of a tight sheath that wouldn't stretch enough to open that wide. Why I would think that after watching two circumcisions is beyond me.


FWIW, my mother said my C was made so painful by the doctor that she would have never put another son through it. She's very much the tough love type so it's saying something that she was traumatized by the event enough to influence future decisions. It's probably good I was too young to remember it because I never gave second thought with my boys.

 

[♪alt13]

I kind of guessed it would be "unwrapped" while in the act as there's obviously a strong evolutionary advantage provided by the stimulation, but I've always pictured it more of a tight sheath that wouldn't stretch enough to open that wide. Why I would think that after watching two circumcisions is beyond me.


FWIW, my mother said my C was made so painful by the doctor that she would have never put another son through it. She's very much the tough love type so it's saying something that she was traumatized by the event enough to influence future decisions. It's probably good I was too young to remember it because I never gave second thought with my boys.

Like a special gift. A special spitting gift.