Hardly. Can you provide a single example of me refusing to concede a point when presented with an argument that clearly refuted an argument I made?
Something a parent says to a child which builds resentment in the child and the parent thinks it's a good technique.
I will go ahead and tell you one reason why I oppose the gay agenda (yes, I know people will hate me for this...obviously, I dont care)
1. It doesn stop at gay marriage. Once gay marriage is in place, then it is forced on everyone. It is mandated to be taught in schools (already happens in CA), 2. then churches are forced to perform gay marriages (already being tried in some places), 3.and then they go after Mormon temples, trying to get them shut down when the church says no to performing gay marriages.
That's just a taste. There is much more.
Point 1 is actually a legitimate point. Shouldn't really be an issue in the schools, though. I've read that groups want to force teaching that it's okay, but I'm not down with that.
Point 2 won't happen. Can't force a religious entity to perform ceremonies. Need to show me initiatives where it's being tried.
Point 3 won't happen for the same reasons.
2. No one, to my knowledge, has "forced" army chaplains to perform same-sex marriages. Back in September, the Pentagon made the decision to "permit" military Chaplains to perform same-sex marriages if such marriages are legal in the states they are being performed AND if those ceremonies are in line with the chaplains personal and religious beliefs. In other words, chaplains are no longer forced not to perform same-sex marriages, but can choose not to if they disagree with them.2 and 3 are being done. They have already tried to force the army chaplains to perform gay marriages.
Gay leaders have said on many occasions that forcing complete acceptance is exactly what they want. I don't have the links, but they have already pressured churches to perform ceremonies and I did see a gay leader state that they want to force Mormon temples to also.
Just what I have seen and read.
I stated what I believe. I said it pretty clearly.
I know a lot of you will hate me for it. But what is the point?
You don't know me. You have never met me, and you never will. So who cares?
Me answering your questions won't help any.
You're the one who decided to start talking ****. I was all for being civil with you, but apparently you're incapable of doing the same.
Hardly. Can you provide a single example of me refusing to concede a point when presented with an argument that clearly refuted an argument I made?
That's the problem right there. What I think would "clearly refute" an argument you have made, you would say did not. It just gets to a point where it's all semantics as to an argument. I'm not saying I'm any different, I haven't changed my tune due to anything you have said. Just stating fact. Embrace it.