What's new

Dante Exum vs. the NBA

benchmark

but really we should never ever put exum and magic in a same sentence. that's just not fair for the kid.

Yes, it would be unfair to say Dante will become Magic or something idiotic like that. But nobody is saying that as you seem to imply.

The point of my post is to benchmark against the best, and in the case of large PG and BBall IQ, the best was Magic. Would it be a bad thing for Dante to aspire to this sort of greatness?


Magic also was phenomenal at pushing the ball up the floor and finding scorers on the break, where I think Exum has potential as well as great speed.
 
I think we agree

so i can't really say magic was p!ss poor shooter from the outside because he never really practiced for it.

So you are saying that Magic hypothetically could have been a great outside shooter if he had hypothetically practiced outside shooting. I agree with that! (seriously).

Outside the hypothetical and back into the real world, he did not work to perfect his outside shooting (until last few years) and was not a great shooter for most of his career.

Maybe we can end on that agreement?
 
In terms of a tall PG with great speed and quickness, but who isn't a great jumper/explosive at the rim, I like Barbosa and taller TP comparisons, but also a young JKidd.

Sent from my SGH-T959V using Tapatalk 2
I'm shocked the Devin Harris comp isn't really thrown around anywhere
Umm, no.
Magic Johnson was 6'8" or 6'9 (depending on what site you use). He once played center in a playoff game. Apologies to Stockton, but Magic was the greatest PG to play the game (pure "point", scoring point, blah, blah, blah). Magic had the ability to create shots and put the team on his back. Stockton couldn't do that. As much as I absolutely LOATHE the Lakers and Magic as a person, I can appreciate the incredible talent Johnson was as a player. It was a joy to watch the Johnson/Bird battles. BTW, Magic averaged 19/11 for his career, which was much shorter than Stockton's. His assists averages actually stayed high while John's declined significantly. Had they played the same number of seasons, it would have been interesting to see who finished with the most assists. Magic was also a tremendous rebounder (7 per game). Stockton had an advantage in steals per game (2.2 vs. 1.9).
this is off subject a little, but I have never and will never by the Magic is the greatest pg to play in the nba.

Stockton is the greatest in my opinion. The numbers alone make this argument in my opinion. I also take into account the fact that Magic is around 7-8 inches taller then Stockton and played on one of the iconic most talent laden teams of all time (show time ). Think of it this way. Stockton through his career put up mind numbing insain stats, and was a great shooter and as clutch as they come. Without looking at his stats he probably had 5-6 years in a row where his stats were better then the two MVP seasons Nash had, and had he and Malone had not run into MJ in the finals, it's possible he should've could've had two chips. But my favorite arguement is this... Put Stockton on the same Lakers team Magic played on, and then think of the numbers he'd have put up. There wasn't a better player at dominating a game without scoring. Pound for pound the toughest to ever play the game!

Sorry couldn't hold my peace.

I will never except that Magic was better. Taller, yes. It also didn't hurt that he played for one of the all time great teams.





what do you mean by this? how do you know this?
 
Magic is always in the top five all time players.
Stockton never is even close.
Magic played PG.
 
You can build around magic as the center piece. You couldn't do that with stock. I love stock but it's clearly magic who was the better (more valuable?) player, and it's not really that close.

Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
I've seen a lot of ppl say Barbosa. Barbosa was 6'3" and in general does not remind me of Exum much.




£¥£
 
So Exum is a combination of Harris, Barbosa, Jordon, Kobe, Wall, Magic, Parker....

Sounds good to me ;)
 
Back
Top