What's new
By:

Does Lauri Get Traded?

Does Lauri Get Dealt Before The Season Starts?

  • Total voters
    134
  • Poll closed .
MT Steve said:
Stop being obtuse.

The Jazz gave the rookies a ton of burn post-ASB last year. Lauri even played in a lot of those games - the Jazz went 1-12 in them.

Losing and giving the young guys a lot of time will not be an issue.
Click to expand...
I see that "post asb again"

If KO and Simone don't get traded do the rookies get as much burn?

Same question for the year before but with the names conley, Beasley, vando, and naw.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
MT Steve said:
Are KO and Simone coming back?
Click to expand...
Nope. Are Clarkson and Collins and Lauri and Sexton leaving? Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if juzang and eubanks be taking minutes from young dudes.

I been expecting Kessler to be ahead of collins and KO in the rotation. Hardy like hell no

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
MT Steve said:
I think he'll be the difference between being around 28 wins vs around 24 wins. That win total will be around 4th/5th either way, most likely.


Yeah I know. I just think "getting more L's" should factor extremely little into the decision.
Click to expand...
More likely to cost you about 2 draft slots... in the last 10 or so years it was roughly 2 spots. Ranges from no diff to going from tied for 3rd to tied for 8th. And you are in dangerous territory in 24-28 win range. Win a couple close games you shouldn't and things get dicey.

If tanking is part of the evaluation when it comes to roster additions and Lauri I am not sure why it wouldn't contribute to the possibility that we move Walker/Sexton or anyone else.
 
fishonjazz said:
Nope. Are Clarkson and Collins and Lauri and Sexton leaving? Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if juzang and eubanks be taking minutes from young dudes.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I don't even know what your point is anymore. We had all those guys post-ASB last year and still sucked.
 
MT Steve said:
Stop being obtuse.

The Jazz gave the rookies a ton of burn post-ASB last year. Lauri even played in a lot of those games - the Jazz went 1-12 in them.

Losing and giving the young guys a lot of time will not be an issue.
Click to expand...
They traded multiple vets and benched multiple healthy vets. They won't do that for 82 games. Hardy will generally play the best players that are available to him and has reiterated there is no free playing time.
 
MT Steve said:
Stop being obtuse.

The Jazz gave the rookies a ton of burn post-ASB last year. Lauri even played in a lot of those games - the Jazz went 1-12 in them.

Losing and giving the young guys a lot of time will not be an issue.
Click to expand...

While understanding how lot of minutes for rookies mean higher probability of losing, I don't thing post ASB rotations can be too big of a measure stick. Hardy seems to be a coach with clear visions, and he worked really hard to find working rotations until they work as much they did. They got completely ruined, when they traded the two role players that really made things work.

That said, with current roster, it needs significant jumps in the level of play for young guys, if this version of Jazz want to go for extended run of winning ball like the mid-season was. In a vacuum, Simone and KO don't necessarily move a needle, but they were really, really fitting complimentary pieces to Jazz starting lineup and bench unit.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
They traded multiple vets and benched multiple healthy vets. They won't do that for 82 games. Hardy will generally play the best players that are available to him and has reiterated there is no free playing time.
Click to expand...
Post-ASB, they went 1-12 in games that Lauri played, 2-10 in games that Clarkson played, 3-22 in games that Sexton played, and 1-8 in games all three of them played.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
More likely to cost you about 2 draft slots... in the last 10 or so years it was roughly 2 spots. Ranges from no diff to going from tied for 3rd to tied for 8th. And you are in dangerous territory in 24-28 win range. Win a couple close games you shouldn't and things get dicey.

If tanking is part of the evaluation when it comes to roster additions and Lauri I am not sure why it wouldn't contribute to the possibility that we move Walker/Sexton or anyone else.
Click to expand...
Because the odds of keeping Kessler costing us a superstar by winning too many games are extremely low. We've been over the probabilities - trading a player to squeeze out a few more losses is a really small boost.
 
MT Steve said:
Post-ASB, they went 1-12 in games that Lauri played, 2-10 in games that Clarkson played, 3-22 in games that Sexton played, and 1-8 in games all three of them played.
Click to expand...
I mean I am looking at BB ref and Lauri played 9 games after the all star break.
 
MT Steve said:
I don't even know what your point is anymore. We had all those guys post-ASB last year and still sucked.
Click to expand...
Yep. After trades were made which forced lineup and rotation changes. (And some fake injuries)

I could totally see hardy going with sexton, Clarkson, Lauri, Collins and eubanks all rockin around 30 minutes per game or some BS (maybe juzang gets big minutes as well) Until the trade deadline trades of Clarkson and Sexton force rotation changes.

I have seen this movie a couple times before.


I desperately want to be wrong

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
fishonjazz said:
Yep. After trades were made which forced lineup and rotation changes. (And some fake injuries)

I could totally see hardy going with sexton, Clarkson, Lauri, Collins and eubanks all rockin around 30 minutes per game or some BS (maybe juzang gets big minutes as well) Until the trade deadline trades of Clarkson and Sexton force rotation changes.

I have seen this movie a couple times before.


I desperately want to be wrong

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
We were trash with Sexton/Clarkson/Lauri/Collins after the trades last year, even in games they all played. I do not think Eubanks is going to move the needle on that.
 
MT Steve said:
We were trash with Sexton/Clarkson/Lauri/Collins after the trades last year, even in games they all played. I do not think Eubanks is going to move the needle on that.
Click to expand...
So do Simone and KO have AS impact... because there was a stretch where we went 15-5 and those guys would have been the only difference. I think our 12 straight losses or whatever is not something we should look to when projecting how good or bad we will be. We have an AS caliber player, 3 starting caliber players, and a couple rotation worthy players. Until midseason we won't be seeing nearly as much dev time as some project. I bet Williams is the only rookie that plays early. I would also bet Keyonte is quite a bit better.

We won 31 games with this crew... lost Dunn, Tech, KO, THT, Ochai... tanked our faces off post ASB. Key was a driving force for losing and should be better. I would suspect if Kessler, Lauri on the the roster they play more than they did last year but who knows. Taylor will be better than whatever Ochai was... like I'm just not sure why we assume this crew is gonna be worse than Hornets, Pistons, Bulls, Portland. I think we are somewhere in the 7th-9th rank and that puts us dangerously close to where we can't tank hard enough down the stretch.

Remove one or two parts and you could easily be 3rd or 4th worst... I think it matters a lot.
 
MT Steve said:
We were trash with Sexton/Clarkson/Lauri/Collins after the trades last year, even in games they all played. I do not think Eubanks is going to move the needle on that.
Click to expand...
Yep. After the trades. Those trades messed up the team (rotations were forced to be changed) and were a gut punch to Hardy.

So this season hardy will ride the vets hard and we will get in a rhythm for the first half of the season and then there will be trades and forced rotation changes and another gut punch followed by losses to end the season. Hopefully we get better than the 9th pick. I didn't like how the last 2 seasons played out.

I'm actually down with giving up assets to make it so hardy has to play the rookies and 2nd year guys (and Kessler). Throw a first in with Clarkson and Collins if you have to. We got plenty of quantity. Picks and young guys bursting at the seams. I would like to add quality next season. Get a future mvp (increase the chances of getting one anyway)
Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
When factoring in how bad we could possibly be I think you also have to factor in our unique home court advantage as well. We have a better roster than 6 or 7 teams and a unique advantage… article have been written about it… whether it’s the altitude, stars sitting because of how the schedule sets up, or rabid fans… whatever it is… we consistently outperform at home. Sometimes the difference between 5th place and 9th place is 4 wins… sometimes 10… but with Lauri, Sexton, Kessler, HC advantage, we have higher base than many of the teams we are discussing. Playing in the west is helpful… but if we aren’t going to be play in worthy… which we won’t… go ahead and make sure you are maximizing your odds. If it really is a sellers market then maybe Sexton and Kessler are at their peak value. There’s zero reason to play with fire.
 
There is no chance we win 30 games with the current roster. Last season our top 5 in net rating (min 10 games) were:

Lauri +0.6
Dunn +0.4
Tech -0.5
Juzang -1.8
KO -3.1

KO and Tech numbers are a bit inflated compared to others as they only played in the better pre-DL version of the team.

However now Dunn is also gone, and our roster is so full of young guys that they cant really even add vets who could contribute to winning, unless they trade some kids away.
 
i get attached to players, and with them changing all the time, i am losing my attatchment to the team. there is no consitency. my fandom is dying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top