What's new

Does Lauri Get Traded?

Does Lauri Get Dealt Before The Season Starts?


  • Total voters
    134
  • Poll closed .
Having a good player on a rookie contract is great…it’s just not the same when you’re tanking. For teams with an extreme cap crunch, solid production on a small amount of salary is vital. It’s one of the reasons why a Kessler trade makes sense. His contract means so much more for a team trying to win now and with salary concerns. For a tanking team with no salary concerns, not so much.

We can hyper fixate on very specific scenarios that make Kuminga doomsday (including when he’s good apparently)…but considering all possibilities, we’re in a great position to bring in Kuminga and see how he does playing for his next contract.

You do not have to take a blood oath to automatically give him a bad deal. The fear of making a bad decision on him would be like not wanting draft picks because we might make a bad decision.
  • Podz was better as a rookie than Kuminga was as a 3rd year player
  • Pod is a more universal fit, which does matter when you are team building
  • Having a guy on a rookie contract vs a guy on a max when the rookie contract player is better is the same across the board. It's better.
 
  • Podz was better as a rookie than Kuminga was as a 3rd year player
  • Pod is a more universal fit, which does matter when you are team building
  • Having a guy on a rookie contract vs a guy on a max when the rookie contract player is better is the same across the board. It's better.

Eh….I wouldn’t say Podz was better than Kuminga. I don’t really have anything bad to say about Podz except that he was very inefficient especially given his offensive load, but Kuminga had a really good year especially after his slow start. They are basically the same age and I think Kuminga has more room for growth as a less polished product.

Podz is very portable across different teams and that is something he has over Kuminga atm.

Rookie contract is also better across the board, never contested that. But it’s significantly more important for a win now team with cap issues than a tanking team with no long term money.

Podz is a really nice player, but Kuminga is also a really nice prospect and we would be in a great position to take a chance on him. I see more upside potential with Kuminga and if we’re in complete tank mode I value that most.
 
I have no idea why Lauri would prefer to go to GS. The team would be gutted and no way to improve their aging roster. They would be a playoff team if healthy but not a competitive one. Green has already fallen off and will continue. Steph is still elite but I am not sure that is enough to do much and they are 1 Steph injury away from out of the playoffs and wont have their own pick. He is better building something here. If he cares about winning then he would not sign an extension and sign as a FA with a team and give up the extra money. That way the team isnt gutted to trade from him. Or wait it out and build with Utah.

Personally I would not trade him for any package GS can or is offering. The only way I would feel slightly okay is if GS gives up every pick, swap, and young player we want. But I doubt they do that. So I think he stays since its a bad move to trade him.

That said I dont think we are a bottom 5 this year with Lauri, Sexton, and others. We are better than last year. Last year we were awful at the Guard positions for about the first half of the year. I think that part is likely solved. Sexton is drastically improved from the start of last year. I think Clarkson likely has a bounce back season, especially since I think he goes back to his role he is used to. I think its clear that Keyonte is improved. Not having THT get major minutes is a plus. Kessler will be improved. Collins improved a lot across last season despite being in a bad role for him. I think he has continued to learn and will be better after an off season with the staff. The 1st and 2nd year guys will be up and down but a few of them have a chance to actually contribute to winning.

Post trades last year should not really be looked at. The team went full tank and the players quit. They also benched a lot of guys and made it clear we wanted to lose and thats what happened. We lost a couple guys but I dont think that matters too much and the improvements from our other players is bigger than the loss of those guys. I think we are a borderline play in team again unless there is more trades with a chance to be even better if we have a breakout performance from a young guy.

Sexton would be the player to move to drop off but I dont think his value is high around the league. He also could take another jump and/or play like he did in the second half with more minutes and really be a difference maker. His value would jump up big time or make himself a keeper. If he can improve passing even more and play with Lauri better that could win a lot of games.
He doesn't.

He wants to stay in Utah.
 
He doesn't.

He wants to stay in Utah.
I have absolutely no idea what that even means.

In a vacuum, I'm sure the average NBA player hates being traded. But when the alternative is quite literally wasting your All Star level prime on a tanking team, sitting out games for dubious reasons and killing your stats playing with a bunch of kids... do you still "want to stay"?

I mean, it's extremely likely Lauri will be traded anyway in the near future. The timeline just doesn't make sense. He must know that.

Mid last season, I started raising the point that the Jazz should trade Lauri ASAP when it became apparent that winning was not the goal and the timelines of the player and the team wouldn't work in the long run. I was ridiculed and called crazy. Well, here we are now.

Markkanen should have been gone at the trade DL. Ainge is senile.
 
I have absolutely no idea what that even means.

In a vacuum, I'm sure the average NBA player hates being traded. But when the alternative is quite literally wasting your All Star level prime on a tanking team, sitting out games for dubious reasons and killing your stats playing with a bunch of kids... do you still "want to stay"?

I mean, it's extremely likely Lauri will be traded anyway in the near future. The timeline just doesn't make sense. He must know that.

Mid last season, I started raising the point that the Jazz should trade Lauri ASAP when it became apparent that winning was not the goal and the timelines of the player and the team wouldn't work in the long run. I was ridiculed and called crazy. Well, here we are now.

Markkanen should have been gone at the trade DL. Ainge is senile.
$200M and there is more to life than just winning basketball games. If the market works for his lifestyle and he enjoys other aspects of life is he “wasting” his time here?
 
$200M and there is more to life than just winning basketball games. If the market works for his lifestyle and he enjoys other aspects of life is he “wasting” his time here?
Yes, at the end of the day the NBA is a job and people want to maximize their earnings in the short window they have. Unless they absolutely hate their situation, they are going to want to stay where the money is at. The Jazz also have a ton of assets to quickly turn the team around at any point they want to along with Danny Ainge, who I'm sure holds a decent level of clout among players for his ability to build a team.
 
Yes, at the end of the day the NBA is a job and people want to maximize their earnings in the short window they have. Unless they absolutely hate their situation, they are going to want to stay where the money is at. The Jazz also have a ton of assets to quickly turn the team around at any point they want to along with Danny Ainge, who I'm sure holds a decent level of clout among players for his ability to build a team.
Plus who the hell would want to deal with Draymond ******** everyday.
 
Back
Top