What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Its funny because the trumpers like to say this is all simply biden attacking his political opponent to try to get re elected and that is a bad thing. Meanwhile I never actually hear Biden being involved in any of this.

Then you have trump back in 2015/16 saying how Hilary is a criminal and how he is going to put her in jail. Then you have trump on a phone call with the president of ukraine telling him he has to investigate Biden or else his country wont get funds that were already approved by congress. Trumpers have no problem with either of those things though.
 
Meh. The whole thing is a show trial. Here is the script:

The judge will deny any effort from the defense to conduct reasonable discovery so the show can happen as scheduled. Trump will be found guilty. Biden will pardon Trump saying it is time for the nation to heal. All of this will happen before the election. Biden will then be elected President for 4 more years.

The DOJ and judge are nothing but props in the DNC's 2024 campaign. And it absolutely will work.

Here is the real question: If Trump is convicted and then pardoned, will that be enough for you to consider it justice?

Biden isn't pardoning Trump.
 
What’s the over/under Trump breaks the judge’s orders very publicly in the next 24 hrs?


 
Hahahaha

Well, that sure didn’t take long. Lock his *** up. Republicans have been telling me for months that we have a two tiered justice system. So let’s make sure Donald isn’t treated any different from the rest of us and lock his *** up for breaking the judge’s orders.
 
Biden isn't pardoning Trump.
Nor should he. Trump’s and this authoritarian movement on the right’s actions have consequences. Letting these criminals off will have MAJOR consequences for our democracy going forward. Besides, we are a nation of law and order. The jailing starts when the criming starts.
 
Good analysis of the criminal indictments.


View: https://youtu.be/SbIhNmoZLJQ


I'll bet the main thing that irks Donald is that they don't refer to him as "President Trump" throughout the indictment.



Emily post says the Judge is right

Formally Addressing the Former President​

When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well. When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”
 
Emily post says the Judge is right

Formally Addressing the Former President​

When addressing a former President of the United States in a formal setting, the correct form is “Mr. LastName.” (“President LastName” or “Mr. President” are terms reserved for the current head of state.) This is true for other ex-officials, as well. When talking about the person to a third party, on the other hand, it’s appropriate to say, “former President LastName.” This holds for introductions, as well: A current state governor is introduced as “Governor Tom Smith,” while you’d introduce an ex-governor as “former Governor Jim Bell.”
Oh the judge is absolutely correct. But it'll still piss Trump off.
 
Back
Top