What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Unfortunately the answer is yes. Because the danger he poses, as ridiculous and juvenile and insane as he is, is very very real.
Oh yeah, the answer is STIIL yes, accompanied by a cold hard chill down the old spine, knowing just how real that danger is. It’s been one hell of a ride though history in recent years, and our present moment is like no other, 2024 like no other year in our history. Buckled in for the ride, lol…
 

A political action committee (PAC) supporting Donald Trump's presidential campaign was dealt a blow by Wisconsin's bipartisan ethics commission, which recommended it face criminal charges for allegedly trying to circumvent campaign finance laws to support a challenger to an anti-Trump Republican.

The bipartisan ethics commission is split evenly between Democrats and Republicans. Commission chair Pat Strachota, a Republican who formerly served as assembly speaker, signed off on the order recommending charges against the PAC. Two-thirds of the commission is required for any action, meaning at least one Republican member agreed to recommend the charges.

The commission on Friday released its report into allegations that the Save America PAC joined efforts to illegally donate tens of thousands of dollars to the campaign of Adam Steen, who challenged Wisconsin Assembly Speaker Robin Vos in 2022.

Despite efforts to unseat Vos, he ended up winning the 2022 Republican primary by 260 votes, delivering a loss for Trump in the crucial battleground state. He easily secured victory in the general election, beating back a Democratic challenger and write-in effort from Steen.

In a lengthy statement endorsing Steen, Trump knocked Vos as a "RINO" who "consistently blocked efforts at conducting a full cyber forensic audit of the 2020 election."

"He does not come close to supporting America First policies, and I do not come close to supporting him," Trump wrote.

Vos joined the former president in voicing concerns about the validity of the 2020 election but ultimately declined to decertify the results, sparking outrage from some Trump-aligned conservatives.
 
Last edited:

Fox News cut off Donald Trump's speech at a rally in South Carolina to fact-check comments he made on Friday, 23 February.

Neil Cavuto spoke over coverage of the former president's event to tell viewers: "He’s entitled to his opinions, he’s not entitled to his own set of facts... The market has indeed been going up but having nothing to do with him."

"Judges picked by Donald Trump himself found no evidence of a [rigged election] in seven battleground states," he added.
 

The Supreme Court has officially dismissed appeals after reviewing sanctions against two pro-Trump attorneys, Sidney Powell and Lin Wood. The lawyers along with five others had challenged the outcome of the 2020 election in Michigan.
 

“The size of the certiorari vote could very well be significant in Trump v. United States. Although we do not know the precise votes, the justices’ recusals are always announced even at the certiorari stage. We, therefore, know that Justice Thomas did not recuse himself, even though his wife was deeply involved in the efforts to subvert the 2020 election.

It is, thus, conceivable that Thomas delivered the crucial final vote to grant review and delay the trial, resulting in the lifeline, gift and huge win for Trump, no matter the case’s outcome on the merits”….

“……Or maybe not. It is also possible — perhaps even likely — that five or more justices voted to take up the issue of presidential immunity, making any single vote irrelevant. Unfortunately, the Supreme Court’s insistence on secrecy has made it impossible to know whether Thomas has improperly exerted a determinative influence on the court’s agenda, in one of the most significant certiorari decisions in history”.
 

— A longtime Mar-a-Lago employee who is a central witness in the investigation into former President Donald Trump’s handling of classified documents is now speaking publicly because he believes that voters should hear the truth about his former boss and the case before the November election.

Brian Butler, who is referenced as “Trump Employee 5” in the classified documents indictment brought by special counsel Jack Smith, told CNN in an exclusive interview that he doesn’t believe the criminal case against Trump is a “witch hunt,” as the former president has claimed.
 
I agree with coach. The only way to bring back god is to elect a thrice married corrupt rapist who sleeps with porn stars and has 90+ felony counts, and incited an insurrection. It’s the only way American Christianity can be saved…

 
I agree with coach. The only way to bring back god is to elect a thrice married corrupt rapist who sleeps with porn stars and has 90+ felony counts, and incited an insurrection. It’s the only way American Christianity can be saved…

He keeps saying the Democrats are trying to take God out of our country.

How does one even remove God from our country? Is God really that weak that Democrats can just deport him or put him on a bus and send him to Mexico or something?

Are the Democrats also removing ghosts from our country?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
 
He keeps saying the Democrats are trying to take God out of our country.

How does one even remove God from our country? Is God really that weak that Democrats can just deport him or put him on a bus and send him to Mexico or something?

Are the Democrats also removing ghosts from our country?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk
Yeah **** the ghosts. Get'em outtaheeerreeee!
 
Back
Top