Donald is about to go through some things...

[SteakNEggs]

Ya my mistake. I had gotten really good at not clicking the button in the app to view the ignored post. Then for some reason today I clicked the button. Always a bad idea.
I wish the app worked like the web browser. When I'm on jazzfanz.com I can't even see that the troll posted. In the app I see every time that it posts but I have to click something to reveal the post.

Just have to keep practicing not clicking that button. I was doing so well too. Oh well, back to the drawing board

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

The irony. I am talking politics. You are literally trolling lol.

Trolling is when someone posts or comments online to ‘bait’ people, which means deliberately provoking an argument or emotional reaction. In some cases they say things they don’t even believe, just to cause drama. In other cases, they may not agree with the views of another person or group online, so they try to discredit, humiliate or punish them.

https://www.esafety.gov.au/young-people/trolling

.

 

[SteakNEggs]

Now I'm not a huge Glen Beck guy but he explains why the trial has been postponed. @fishonjazz @Red I watched your video yesterday and picked it apart. The blatant lie about an NDA when she admitted it never happened long before 2016. So I ask you to return the favor and watch how Beck breaks down how the FBI literally brought in outside evidence and planted it. Literally, this has been admitted by Jack Smith. They not only tampered with evidence, they planted evidence that didn't even exist. Fish thinks this is all just Cannon being a two tiered system but he can't explain how. Me I can show fish why this is being postponed. You guys talk about threats to Democracy when Joe Bidens FBI is literally planting evidence.

 

[SteakNEggs]

This is a very blue state. Imagine if Democrats weren't taking cases from nearly 20 years ago to rig the election and keep Trump off of the campaign trail. As I pointed out even moderates know who the real threat to Democracy is. The ones openly supporting Hamas, the ones taking leading candidates off ballots, the ones using Judges who literally donated to Biden and has a daughter who works for Biden, the ones planting evidence at Mar A Lago that you guys are silent about for obvious reasons.

100,000 people gather New Jersey Trump rally in insane scenes​

Insane pictures show Donald Trump speaking a rally which more than 100,000 Americans attended in scenes akin to a massive pop concert.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/100000-people-gather-new-jersey-trump-rally-in-insane-scenes/news-story/b2bcfd6b90f18e99bcaebf030c5b4972%3famp

 

[Red]

Why would a defendant say he would testify?

I guess with the trump the answer is simple. He knows his dumbass followers believe him and then he can tell them that the judge wouldn't let him testify and they would believe that or he could tell them that he did testify and it was the best testifying anyone has ever done and they would believe that.

Or just because he can't talk without lying.

It's trump. He is a dumbass liar

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

The cross exam of Stormy, the entire tone of it, was due to Trump telling his lawyers to attack her. It’s killing him that he cannot attack her or say anything he wants.


Further, several experienced court observers pointed out, that the fact that not one single juror was seen taking notes during the cross exam, can be taken as a very good sign that the jury believed Stormy’s testimony.

"Complete disaster": Legal experts say lawyer grilling Stormy Daniels "made it worse" for Trump

Instead of key question "undermining Daniels, she got the better of the exchange,” says Norm Eisen.

www.salon.com

Hindsight is 2020, but as Judge Juan Merchan explained to Donald Trump’s defense team on Thursday: If you didn’t want a problematic alleged sexual encounter with your client openly discussed in a Manhattan courtroom, you shouldn’t have brought it up on the first day of trial by denying any such interaction ever took place. And when Stormy Daniels began testifying, recounting in excruciating detail her claimed hotel-room rendezvous with the former president, it was the defense counsel’s job to stand up and say what they believed was out of bounds, Merchan said.

“For the life of me,” Merchan said at the end of Thursday’s proceedings, per ABC News, “I don’t know why Ms. [Susan] Necheles didn’t object.”

Those failures led the judge in Trump’s criminal hush money case from granting a defense motion for a mistrial. But observers of the cross examination that took place earlier in the day can understand why the former president’s lawyers would try.

"Jurors won't like it": Experts say Trump lawyer's victim-shaming of Stormy Daniels was a "disaster"

Trump attorney Susan Necheles repeatedly sought to paint Daniels as "nutty and slutty," legal analyst says.

www.salon.com

 

[SteakNEggs]

Those failures led the judge in Trump’s criminal hush money case from granting a defense motion for a mistrial. But observers of the cross examination that took place earlier in the day can understand why the former president’s lawyers would try.

So you admit it's a hoax. Thank you.

You still refuse to address the judge being Biden donor and his daughter literally working for Biden and Chuck Schumer making him nearly 100 million off of this trial. Why not? Don't you think that's important?

 

[SteakNEggs]

The cross exam of Stormy, the entire tone of it, was due to Trump telling his lawyers to attack her. It’s killing him that he cannot attack her or say anything he wants.

"Complete disaster": Legal experts say lawyer grilling Stormy Daniels "made it worse" for Trump

Instead of key question "undermining Daniels, she got the better of the exchange,” says Norm Eisen.

www.salon.com

Hindsight is 2020, but as Judge Juan Merchan explained to Donald Trump’s defense team on Thursday: If you didn’t want a problematic alleged sexual encounter with your client openly discussed in a Manhattan courtroom, you shouldn’t have brought it up on the first day of trial by denying any such interaction ever took place. And when Stormy Daniels began testifying, recounting in excruciating detail her claimed hotel-room rendezvous with the former president, it was the defense counsel’s job to stand up and say what they believed was out of bounds, Merchan said.

“For the life of me,” Merchan said at the end of Thursday’s proceedings, per ABC News, “I don’t know why Ms. [Susan] Necheles didn’t object.”

Those failures led the judge in Trump’s criminal hush money case from granting a defense motion for a mistrial. But observers of the cross examination that took place earlier in the day can understand why the former president’s lawyers would try.

This is also admission of a Judge being impartial. He openly admits that what Stormy did was unnecessary but he admits he allowed it to hurt Trump. Right? He's literally admitting that unnecessary evidence that has absolutely nothing to do with the trial is why there's no mistrial. All because the defense didn't object to unnecessary evidence? Can you really not understand this?

Luckily as we see, Trump popularity is growing. 100,000 people in New Jersey. People can see how this is nothing more than a farce. People are seeing through this obvious bs. Well most anyways.

 

[fishonjazz]

The cross exam of Stormy, the entire tone of it, was due to Trump telling his lawyers to attack her. It’s killing him that he cannot attack her or say anything he wants.


Further, several experienced court observers pointed out, that the fact that not one single juror was seen taking notes during the cross exam, can be taken as a very good sign that the jury believed Stormy’s testimony.

"Complete disaster": Legal experts say lawyer grilling Stormy Daniels "made it worse" for Trump

Instead of key question "undermining Daniels, she got the better of the exchange,” says Norm Eisen.

www.salon.com

Hindsight is 2020, but as Judge Juan Merchan explained to Donald Trump’s defense team on Thursday: If you didn’t want a problematic alleged sexual encounter with your client openly discussed in a Manhattan courtroom, you shouldn’t have brought it up on the first day of trial by denying any such interaction ever took place. And when Stormy Daniels began testifying, recounting in excruciating detail her claimed hotel-room rendezvous with the former president, it was the defense counsel’s job to stand up and say what they believed was out of bounds, Merchan said.

“For the life of me,” Merchan said at the end of Thursday’s proceedings, per ABC News, “I don’t know why Ms. [Susan] Necheles didn’t object.”

Those failures led the judge in Trump’s criminal hush money case from granting a defense motion for a mistrial. But observers of the cross examination that took place earlier in the day can understand why the former president’s lawyers would try.

"Jurors won't like it": Experts say Trump lawyer's victim-shaming of Stormy Daniels was a "disaster"

Trump attorney Susan Necheles repeatedly sought to paint Daniels as "nutty and slutty," legal analyst says.

www.salon.com

Yep. So trumps lawyers let everyone one know that they want to talk about stormy right on day one. Judge allows it. Trumpers will obviously claim that it's unfair that they are discussing the stormy and trump encounter because trump is always the victim. Even though it's only happening because the trumps lawyers brought it up at the beginning of the trial.

If the judge decided that the encounter didn't matter in this case and therefore didn't allow it to be discussed then trumpers could say that the judge is being unfair to trump by not allowing the sexual encounter to be discussed. Again, trump is the victim. So silly.



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Sardines]

Yep. So trumps lawyers let everyone one know that they want to talk about stormy right on day one. Judge allows it. Trumpers will obviously claim that it's unfair that they are discussing the stormy and trump encounter because trump is always the victim. Even though it's only happening because the trumps lawyers brought it up at the beginning of the trial.

If the judge decided that the encounter didn't matter in this case and therefore didn't allow it to be discussed then trumpers could say that the judge is being unfair to trump by not allowing the sexual encounter to be discussed. Again, trump is the victim. So silly.



Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

It's a pretty OP superpower to be able to always be the victim whilst also being the courageous hero. He's spamming the **** out of it, too.

 

[SteakNEggs]

One thing we all need to remember about this trial is that trump isn't on trial for whether he slept with stormy or not. That is actually irrelevant to this case.

Suddenly it's relevant lolololollololollllolollolollollolollol.... YOu are the biggest liar and hypocrite potentially that I've ever met. I honestly mean that. In a matter of a day you flip flop that it's "irrelevant" then the very...next...day... you completely contradict what you said just yesterday. You cannot make this double standard lying hypocrisy up. "One thing we need to remember" then you forget less than 24 hours later. L...o....l...

 

[SteakNEggs]

One thing we all need to remember about this trial is that trump isn't on trial for whether he slept with stormy or not. That is actually irrelevant to this case.

What's unfair is the judge being a Biden Donor and avid supporter but not one of you will address that because you're a hypocrite. You literally have the judges daughter working for Biden and making Chuck Schumer almost 100 million off of this. What's unfair is that Trump can ot talk about this or be put in prison......

 

[fishonjazz]

It's a pretty OP superpower to be able to always be the victim whilst also being the courageous hero. He's spamming the **** out of it, too.

Yep. Poor trump. What a rough life he has. Everyone and everything out to get him. Time magazine and the emmys were even out to get him. Its never ever trumps fault for anything. Always just someone being unfair to poor trump.
If only everyone knew that trump knows more about everything that everyone. Too bad only his followers believe that to be true. Poor trump.

 

[Sardines]

Yep. Poor trump. What a rough life he has.

That's the funniest thing about him to me. His dad was a good real estate investor/developer in NYC at a very good time to be in that market. He taught old Donny everything he needed to know, introduced him to all the people he'd need to know, gave him more money than any person would ever need to live a very very nice life, and at the end of the day... if Trump would have put all the money daddy gave him in the late '70s into a mutual fund instead of playing business man he'd have several times the amount of money he has managed to "earn" over his very long business career.

If you put some of your money into a company matched 401k you are literally (and I mean by the actual definition of "literal") a better business person than Donald J Trump has ever been.

Sad.