Donald is about to go through some things...

[JimLes]

What do you base your legal analysis on?

The simple fact that he could kill a baby in front of a live audience and the Supreme Court(and you just know they'd take up the appeal) would reverse the conviction.

 

[fishonjazz]

Pretty funny. At least his orange jumpsuit will match his face lol

On a serious note tho there’s zero chance this will hold up on appeal. The actual legal case itself is a joke

Fun times ahead though. Good grief.

Like I said earlier in this thread. This case was the most obviously guilty one of all. There was no doubt.

Not sure why you can't see it. Maybe your red hat is too low and covering your eyes?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Deleted member 365]

The simple fact that he could kill a baby in front of a live audience and the Supreme Court(and you just know they'd take up the appeal) would reverse the conviction.

So why don’t we reform the court?

Seems like everyone now admits that the supreme court is a joke. So reforming it should be easier, right?

 

[Al-O-Meter]

I’m not a lawyer, so does Trump’s *** rot in jail until his sentencing?

No chance of that. Trump would be elected in a landslide if that happened and everybody knows it. That is the opposite of what Biden wants and as this trial is purely a show to influence the election, that would be counterproductive.

 

[Sardines]

No chance of that. Trump would be elected in a landslide if that happened and everybody knows it. That is the opposite of what Biden wants and as this trial is purely a show to influence the election, that would be counterproductive.

This trial is brought by the state of New York to address crimes that Trump has been convicted of committing.

A crime was committed, charges were filed, a trial was held, a verdict was reached.

That's what this was.

No man is above the law.

 

[FalseFlagg K]

Uhhh, I think the fact that this was not a mixed verdict (34 individual counts) and came back relatively quickly means that the evidence was pretty strong.

What do you base your legal analysis on?

Man I hope he goes to jail that would be hilarious.

The fact that it came back so quickly and he was found guilty in every count just makes it look even worse in terms of deficiencies in due process.

The convoluted way the charge was manipulated to upgrade from a misdemeanour to a felony, the actual crime to link it to wasn’t disclosed until after the defence’s closing statement, the lack of actual evidence to what the accusation was, the woeful credibility of the key witness, there’s many grounds for appeal that his team can use. The trial being in New York where he’ll say he couldn’t get a fair hearing. It’ll get thrown out on appeal unfortunately because this case is the biggest overreach legally. It would’ve been better if he was convicted of one of the other two that actually have a decent serious basis.

 

[Al-O-Meter]

This trial is brought by the state of New York to address crimes that Trump has been convicted of committing.

A crime was committed, charges were filed, a trial was held, a verdict was reached.

That's what this was.

No man is above the law.

LOL. Sure, tell yourself that. It was a series of misdemeanors elevated to felonies alleging a conspiracy to commit a Federal crime that Federal prosecutors said didn't happen. This was a show.

 

[Sardines]

Man I hope he goes to jail that would be hilarious.

The fact that it came back so quickly and he was found guilty in every count just makes it look even worse in terms of deficiencies in due process.

The convoluted way the charge was manipulated to upgrade from a misdemeanour to a felony, the actual crime to link it to wasn’t disclosed until after the defence’s closing statement, the lack of actual evidence to what the accusation was, the woeful credibility of the key witness, there’s many grounds for appeal that his team can use. The trial being in New York where he’ll say he couldn’t get a fair hearing. It’ll get thrown out on appeal unfortunately because this case is the biggest overreach legally. It would’ve been better if he was convicted of one of the other two that actually have a decent serious basis.

Well I guess time will tell.

 

[FalseFlagg K]

Like I said earlier in this thread. This case was the most obviously guilty one of all. There was no doubt.

Not sure why you can't see it. Maybe your red hat is too low and covering your eyes?

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

Red hat lol. Why is it you can’t debate something on its merit without resorting to having to label someone ??

I’d venture to suggest that your hatred of Trump blinds you to rationale thought. I’ll bet you good money this is thrown out on appeal.

Like I said before he should be convicted of the classified documents issue and vote tampering in Georgia. If you think that’s “red hat” then I don’t know what to say

 

[Sardines]

LOL. Sure, tell yourself that. It was a series of misdemeanors elevated to felonies alleging a conspiracy to commit a Federal crime that Federal prosecutors said didn't happen. This was a show.

Funny seeing the talking points repeated almost verbatim.

Bah bah bah says the sheep

 

[fishonjazz]

Man I hope he goes to jail that would be hilarious.

The fact that it came back so quickly and he was found guilty in every count just makes it look even worse in terms of deficiencies in due process.

The convoluted way the charge was manipulated to upgrade from a misdemeanour to a felony, the actual crime to link it to wasn’t disclosed until after the defence’s closing statement, the lack of actual evidence to what the accusation was, the woeful credibility of the key witness, there’s many grounds for appeal that his team can use. The trial being in New York where he’ll say he couldn’t get a fair hearing. It’ll get thrown out on appeal unfortunately because this case is the biggest overreach legally. It would’ve been better if he was convicted of one of the other two that actually have a decent serious basis.

Quickly?
There was another high profile case that got a verdict today. Took 5 hours. This one took much longer. And like I said, this was the most obvious one.

Sent from my CPH2451 using Tapatalk

 

[Sardines]

Red hat lol. Why is it you can’t debate something on its merit without resorting to having to label someone ??

I’d venture to suggest that your hatred of Trump blinds you to rationale thought. I’ll bet you good money this is thrown out on appeal.

Like I said before he should be convicted of the classified documents issue and vote tampering in Georgia. If you think that’s “red hat” then I don’t know what to say

I'll take that bet.

If on first appeal all convictions are thrown out completely with no retrial I'll pay.