Red
Well-Known Member
That's a better description for the Benghazi hearings, and the anticipated Hunter Biden hearings.
Most murder trials target people who have no intention of committing murder in the future. Do you believe in ignoring all past crimes, or just those you approved of?
The funny part for me is I wouldn't care if Biden got removed. He was never my guy and I had Harris on my draft board above him to begin with so... go ahead.
But for real, I wouldn't approve of using the impeachment process without some sort of actual justification, which doesn't currently exist.
I always thought the Republican establishment should have embraced Trump's impeachment. They could have been done with him. They would have kept the White House (because despite things idiots say, impeachments don't overturn elections) and probably would have had a far better shot in the 2020 election.
Al-O-Meter
Well-Known Member
It isn't which crimes but rather who is doing the enforcing. I believe in law enforcement enforcing laws. I do not believe in letting any part of the government seize whatever power they want to go after political enemies. I can see how that will quickly spiral out of control.
This isn't new and it hasn't spiraled out of control over the 200+ years of our history. So sleep soundly child, all is well.
Congressional investigations have been around for a long time. Which other investigations have you objected to over the years? Did you object to the Benghazi hearings? Watergate?
Red
Well-Known Member
I believe what Bannon said in his rant was that they would impeach “everybody in the DOJ”, whatever that means. He was directing those remarks at Garland, not Biden. As far as impeaching Biden, I think we can at least expect an effort in that direction should the GOP take back Congress. I don’t think that impeachment will happen, but, at the least, gotta expect political tumult for the foreseeable future.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
GOP commission refuses to certify New Mexico primary vote
New Mexico’s secretary of state on Tuesday asked the state Supreme Court to order the Republican-led commission of rural Otero County to certify primary election results after it refused to do so over distrust of Dominion vote-tallying machines. Democratic Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse...
So fun that thanks to trump now anytime a candidate wins an election that the GOP election officials dont approve of we can expect elections to not be certified and the results to be questioned. Yay
Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
Red
Well-Known Member
This comment surprised me, as it revealed nothing other than a man running from the truth as fast as he could run. I did not expect that from you. Some may say “but he’s never been interested in a full accounting of an effort to prevent the peaceful transition of power”. That may be, but to read your entire comment, claiming the committee exists for the sole purpose of Democrats creating a diversion from troubles you believe were created by Biden, when your entire comment itself is simply nothing but a diversion, because you do not want a full accounting of this attack on our elections, well, I just did not expect you to be this transparent in broadcasting your actual motivations in running headlong from a full accounting. Which accounting we are owed, and which accounting will help serve as the historical record of these events, and which we will bequeath future historians who will no doubt be interested in the facts uncovered by this particular committee.
Your entire comment reads like no more than a man fearful of the truth, and who is very angry that the American people are being afforded the opportunity to receive a full accounting of that truth. Who is resentful that the truth be known. And that misplaced anger at the fact that the truth will be uncovered is every bit as apparent as your desire to run headlong from it…..
Last edited: