What's new

Donald is about to go through some things...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
Its strange that trump doesn't want his aides to testify on his behalf to help him convince a grand jury that an indictment shouldn't happen in regards to his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

I wonder why he doesn't want them to testify?


Trump's team wants the appeals court to reverse a lower court’s ruling that would force several of his top advisers, including his former chief of staff Mark Meadows, to testify before a grand jury investigating his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
Yeah because he can't count on literally EVERYONE to lie for him, just most of his inner circle. This is getting too far out of the Trump Liar's Club™ for his comfort. They need to either embrace the lie or be silenced, like any good nationalist leader would expect.
 
Its strange that trump doesn't want his aides to testify on his behalf to help him convince a grand jury that an indictment shouldn't happen in regards to his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

I wonder why he doesn't want them to testify?


Trump's team wants the appeals court to reverse a lower court’s ruling that would force several of his top advisers, including his former chief of staff Mark Meadows, to testify before a grand jury investigating his attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
The Grand Jury doesn't consider the defense at all. They are only making a determination if the prosecution has enough evidence to justify a trial on specific charges.
 
The Grand Jury doesn't consider the defense at all. They are only making a determination if the prosecution has enough evidence to justify a trial on specific charges.
Right. If there isn't evidence of wrongdoing, which of course there wouldn't be if trump were innocent, then why go through all the trouble of going to an appeals court to try to prevent these people from appearing in front of a grand jury? Maybe its because trump believes there is evidence of wrongdoing that these people could provide. That would be a good reason for trump to go this route. Im sure he is simply innocent however and is doing this for another reason entirely.
 
Did it occur to you that Trump actually did what he is accused of doing? So in your mind, since there is some kind of technicality available and you can rail against the dems, his ACTUAL innocence or guilt is meaningless?
I don't want Trump anywhere near American politics. I have long been in the DeSantis camp. I have no doubt Trump has done some shady stuff but I have zero exposure to Trump. I do have exposure to the American government. The transformation in the American government is making me uneasy. Historically our justice system has investigated crimes to find individuals responsible. Now it is investigating individuals to find a crime. Our legal code is so byzantine that it is estimated the average person commits three felonies per day.


In this prosecution, the government started with investigating an individual, not a crime. We know this because Alvin Bragg said he was going to do exactly that when he was elected. Then to get around statute of limitations issues, the government used a "novel legal theory" that has NEVER been used before on anyone.


I have no love for Trump, but as a registered big 'L' Libertarian, I do have a problem with our government breaking safeguards that were put in place to protect average people. Sure, Trump isn't "average people", but once broken it becomes easier to break the safeguards again, and again.
 
Right. If there isn't evidence of wrongdoing, which of course there wouldn't be if trump were innocent, then why go through all the trouble of going to an appeals court to try to prevent these people from appearing in front of a grand jury? Maybe its because trump believes there is evidence of wrongdoing that these people could provide. That would be a good reason for trump to go this route. Im sure he is simply innocent however and is doing this for another reason entirely.
Eh, testimony to a grand jury is like talking to the police, it can only hurt you. The prosecutor is trying to clear a hurdle and if there is testimony that you don't think will be admissible at trial it makes sense to try to block it from a grand jury. We have these protections for the accused for a reason and using them is NOT an indication of guilt. Innocent people should use every avenue possible to protect themselves from prosecution every bit as much as a guilty person should.

I absolutely reject the notion that "If you haven't done anything wrong you have nothing to hide."
 
Right. If there isn't evidence of wrongdoing, which of course there wouldn't be if trump were innocent, then why go through all the trouble of going to an appeals court to try to prevent these people from appearing in front of a grand jury? Maybe its because trump believes there is evidence of wrongdoing that these people could provide. That would be a good reason for trump to go this route. Im sure he is simply innocent however and is doing this for another reason entirely.
Watch JCS. Watch Audit The Audit. Watch something to give you a clue. You do not talk to law enforcement even when you believe you are innocent. You are failing your kids if you do not teach them this. Even retired police investigators will tell you not to talk to police investigators.

A police investigator's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A police investigator's job is to gather as much evidence as possible and pass it on to prosecutors.

A prosecutor's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A prosecutor's job is to compile the evidence in a way that it can be used in a trial.

A grand jury's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A grand jury's job is evaluate the prosecutor's work to confirm if it meets a threshold to proceed.

As someone who is accused, it is never in your best interest to give information of any kind to police investigators, prosecutors, or grand juries. NEVER. Those parties are not capable of finding you innocent. As someone who is accused, you give your evidence of your innocence to your lawyer and your lawyer will use that to advocate on your behalf. That is how our system works.
 
Last edited:
tweeting out pictures of you hitting the prosecutor with a bat, is usually a good show of innocence. Typically slandering the prosecutor, the judge, the judge’s wife, the judge’s daughter, is very helpful and something an innocent person would do. Just like calling for GA officials to cook up the exact number of votes you need and organizing an insurrection to prevent the certification of votes is what an innocent person would do. Trump is always innocent. He’s never the aggressor. Always the victim.

IMG_7208.jpeg
 
Watch JCS. Watch Audit The Audit. Watch something to give you a clue. You do not talk to law enforcement even when you believe you are innocent. You are failing your kids if you do not teach them this. Even retired police investigators will tell you not to talk to police investigators.

A police investigator's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A police investigator's job is to gather as much evidence as possible and pass it on to prosecutors.

A prosecutor's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A prosecutor's job is to compile the evidence in a way that it can be used in a trial.

A grand jury's job is not to solve crimes or find the criminal responsible. A grand jury's job is evaluate the prosecutor's work to confirm if it meets a threshold to proceed.

As someone who is accused, it is never in your best interest to give information of any kind to police investigators, prosecutors, or grand juries. NEVER. Those parties are not capable of finding you innocent. As someone who is accused, you give your evidence of your innocence to your lawyer and your lawyer will use that to advocate on your behalf. That is how our system works.
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.
 
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.

Even the obviously innocent can find themselves under arrest.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMMYYajwLms
 
JCS is head and shoulders the best true crime, criminal psychology, interrogation analysis on planet Earth. Period. End. Of. Story. Everyone should watch at least some of it and the one with the innocent guy especially.



Audit the Audit is also gold standard content where they analyze "auditor" content. Give you a good idea what the "First Amendment Auditor" community is up to without having to watch a bunch of ********.

I agree with both of your posts. Love the content that they both put out.
 
Stupid addict cultist. I understand you are so addicted to him but thanks, i guess. I personally don't want Trump but you addicts do and are in euphoria that he's in your spotlight again.. That phrase f around and find out. Any intelligent person, even Democrats and moderates according to polling can see this is nothing more than a cult hoax that happened 7 years ago. At least the cult got your fix. If not the booze, or hard drugs obtained from Barnes and Noble it's Trump. Weak *** addict.

Rasmussen Poll Stunner: Trump Gains 10 Points on Biden Since Indictment​


 
Last edited:
Back
Top