PearlWatson
Well-Known Member
Blanket generalizations are easiest Eric. They don't require any thinking.
Saying homosexuals aren't weak minded is a blanket generalization too...just saying.
Blanket generalizations are easiest Eric. They don't require any thinking.
So, you take mythical elements and equate them to a whole idea. I could assign to all conservatives the appalling state of veteran's benefits in this country, or the desire to attack Iran, or any other of a number of things. I supposed I lack the fundamental simple-mindedness to characterize people that way.
Do you have a source that represent all liberals?
So, you would support the ability of thd Commander-in-Chief to decide this policy?
Saying homosexuals aren't weak minded is a blanket generalization too...just saying.
Saying homosexuals aren't weak minded is a blanket generalization too...just saying.
Yes yes, how could anyone believe in mythical hippie spit and vile accusations. They were all about peace and love.
I believe that hippies were often vile criminals. That does not change the notion of veternas being spit upon from myth to fact.
You continue to revel in highly simplistic reasoning.
Only for a person who has difficulty with basic grammar. Saying "homosexuals aren't weak minded" is the denial of a generalization. The generalization you have confused this with would be "No homosexual is weak-minded".
It doesn't make it any less of a generalization, certainly.If I personally know a veteran who was spit on does that change the notion of it being a myth?
Did you even read one brow's post? If so, it's alarming how thoroughly you misunderstood it.Two can play that game. Saying homosexuals are weak minded is a denial of the generalization that they aren't.