What's new

Elijah Millsap: Lindsey in exit interview: “if u say one more word, I’ll cut your Black *** and send you back to Louisiana”.

In my experience, this usually happens in some form. They tell a fellow co-worker (or here a teammate) or another friend, etc. I'm not saying Millsap is wrong, but waiting six years with no one else remembering when there were two other people in the room does not look super credible.

I think a statement like that would stick with me if I was in the room. My question is what did Millsap say or do in the first place to get chewed out? An end of the bench player should be working the hardest, and being the most appreciative. Don't rock the boat when you are easily replaced.
Yeah I have found that most often we get the info in the investigation. The oldest complaint I have dealt with, comparing to EMs 6 year wait, was about 18 months. We still found a pattern of ongoing behavior and the person was terminated. But I have had allegations we could not corroborate and we generally would require the individual to undergo refresher training on things like harassment if needed, but they generally did not result in terminations.
 
In my experience, this usually happens in some form. They tell a fellow co-worker (or here a teammate) or another friend, etc. I'm not saying Millsap is wrong, but waiting six years with no one else remembering when there were two other people in the room does not look super credible.

I think a statement like that would stick with me if I was in the room. My question is what did Millsap say or do in the first place to get chewed out? An end of the bench player should be working the hardest, and being the most appreciative. Don't rock the boat when you are easily replaced.
And that is the ultimate issue. Elijah has given his former teammates no way to publicly support him in the issue. At this point supporting him would essentially be calling the Jazz front office and their coach liars. This wasn't a "he said/she said," there were several witnesses. There wasn't room left for "teaching" of for creating a better environment because Elijah chose Twitter as his method to air his grievances.

All of the "smoothing" is because his teammates have talked to him and said, "What the Hell?" Obviously, they have probably said the same thing to Lindsey, but he has corroboration, witnesses, and the advantage of not being a flaming racist who people would see saying something like that.

This sucks for Lindsey, but it is probably worse for Elijah. And I feel bad for him because he probably didn't think this through all of the way. I think when he wrote what he did, he may have thought that is what happened. But oftentimes what we "remember" and what happened are not the same.

I read this article a while back and it has really changed the way I feel about some things, especially grudges:

 
I would be stunned if Elijah hadn't told Paul about the situation if and when it happened. I would like to hear his response.
 
My question is what did Millsap say or do in the first place to get chewed out? An end of the bench player should be working the hardest, and being the most appreciative. Don't rock the boat when you are easily replaced.
I think this is part of the problem at hand. We assume that we're being realistic (within a capitalist [though also a historically and even presently racism-tolerating] system) when we say that those lowest on the totem pole should just not rock the boat. And it's true that there's some individual-survival wisdom in this idea.

But this is terrible advice when the goal is to improve the system or to speak truth with integrity. For historically understandable reasons there are many people of color who refuse to buy into the idea that someone should just kept their head low and appreciate what they get.

(I'm not saying whether or not these feelings applied to Millsap six years ago or at any time since -- since I can't know that -- just trying to make a general point)
 
Last edited:
I don't think the problem is denying it. He could have had the same statement while also showing more concern for the issues at hand. "I categorically deny making that statement. We will reach out to Elijah to address this potential misunderstanding".

Like I was saying before, I think both men believe in their truths. To me it's not really about outing one or the other as a liar. I'm just thinking about how the response comes off to the other players. Rudy, for example, said he was close with Elijah. He's probably going to believe Elijah. How do you think Rudy feels when his friend is called a liar?

We're never going to know the whole truth for sure, but what's most important is that the Jazz make it clear to the players that these concerns are taken seriously and not dismissed so quickly.
While I do agree with you that this might have been a better look in some senses ("let's hear each other out privately as reasonable men"), I think you're overlooking the power dynamics that are (still) at play.

To take an extreme example (that is clearly not exactly parallel, but I hope gives a sense of something of the possible issues at stake), imagine that the charge was that a boss (or former boss) raped an employee. If the boss was confronted by a reporter about the accusation and then said something like, "I don't agree, but I'm going to reach out to the accuser and try to make things right," there would be all kinds of red flags raised about whether the boss was using his power to try to minimize the issue or even use the power differential he still possessed to make the accusation go away or even punish or otherwise regain power over the accuser in some way.

Now racial power dynamics don't play out exactly the same as sexual power dynamics, but I think there are enough parallels in this instance that Lindsey wouldn't necessarily have been better served to have gone the "let me try to make things right with Elijah privately" route. (In fact, I just saw a tweet from Millsap subsequent to his initial statement about the exit interview to the effect that he's less interested in "making things right" than speaking the truth with integrity.)

Whether Millsap intended things to play out like they have (and he might have, though sometimes once actions are taken, they lead in not-fully-anticipated directions), I think given the way the social climate and news media work these days, once the accusation went public it would have been hard for Lindsey and Millsap to just reach out to each other as more or less "equals." Maybe somewhere down the line, they might be able to do so, but probably not at first.
 


Again, I think this is very telling that it was a unique, out of character moment and even the accuser is not blaming DL for being racist.

Still not enough info but it feels a little over blown given this tweet post the interview with Elijah himself.

Again, if thats what he said, not good but far from being in character and deserving of a reprimand but a firing would go too far imho.

In fact, I think its an opportunity for Ryan Smith to help push a culture of anti-racism with DL leading the charge.


Still makes me wonder then what is he “shining the light on” with this? That he thinks he had this instance once and only once while with the Jazz? What is the result he is hoping will come from naming DL and publicly making these claims? Seems like he should have just picked up the phone and cleared it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Still makes me wonder then what is he “shining the light on” with this? That he thinks he had this instance once and only once while with the Jazz? What is the result he is hoping will come from naming DL and publicly making these claims? Seems like he should have just picked up the phone and cleared it up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It would be shining a light on power dynamics and use of racially charged language in the workplace. It's not just for him, but for any POC who might have experienced a similar interaction with person who has power over their livelihood. I see why he went public. Going private wouldn't help anything. The fact that you are asking that question tells me you don't have the ability to emphasize.
 
Has Paul chimed in on this ?
Why on Earth would he? He wasnt in the room and I'm pretty sure he only spent a single year under the DL era.

Besides, do you really expect him to go against his brother in any way? His testimony wouldn't really mean much do to the very clear bias he would have.
 
Back
Top