This is great news but at the end of the day, oil and gas are still finite resources and we did need to think about future. As in 100-300 years from now.
True but this is a start.
This is great news but at the end of the day, oil and gas are still finite resources and we did need to think about future. As in 100-300 years from now.
Solar prices are dropping like a rock and utility rates keep climbing. Within 10 years they will both hit equilibrium. Then it will be dumb not to have it.
This is great news but at the end of the day, oil and gas are still finite resources and we did need to think about future. As in 100-300 years from now.
No. Us energy independence is a pipe dream. What's stopping these companies from selling their crap overseas? As soon as we're close to energy independence we'll surely just look to sell more of it keeping us addicted to foreign imports (and the wonderfully high prices and the cha ching they'll provide.
Based on what?
I'll be the first to slap one of those gawdy $20,000 setups on my own roof & go net metering but the stuff isn't anywhere near competitive at current rates. Still takes over 17 years for a payback, with huge govt. and local grants, not counting in cost of capital, and optimum assumptions on price and integrity.
I work in the industry, the new way to do solar is called a PPA. Its basically a solar utility setup where the homeowner doesn't pay out of pocket for the system but then pays a solar utility bill based on KWH. That rate is lower than their current setup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QeMOVpljUY
https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/buygp/solarpower.htm
I work in the industry, the new way to do solar is called a PPA. Its basically a solar utility setup where the homeowner doesn't pay out of pocket for the system but then pays a solar utility bill based on KWH. That rate is lower than their current setup.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QeMOVpljUY
https://www.epa.gov/greenpower/buygp/solarpower.htm
Those advertisements seem silly when the SSP could build a much more efficient plant in more optimal locations than typical residences. If co-ops could do one good thing then this would be it.
So you guys throw solar panels on my roof for free, and then I pay a monthly utility bill as usual? If my average monthly bill over the course of a year is $300, how much would it be with solar panels?
I will show you an example. The typical Massachusetts customer pays somewhere between 16-18 cents per KWH with NSTAR. With Solar/Sunrun they can pay anywhere from .03 cents to about 12 cents per KWH. It all depends on how efficient their roof is. But minimally they should see a 20-30% savings their very first month. That solar rate is also locked in so their saving keeps increasing as the local utilities rates will keep rising. Average utilities rise about 3-6% a year
Additionally states don't charge taxes on clean energy so most should see an additional 10 bucks or so each month too.
Yes, $300/month. Why?
BUT, it will provide many high paying jobs. The product may leave the US but the high wages will stay here and right now we could really use this.
Meh. To me, the payoff isn't substantial enough to offset what happens when I try to sell the house (I personally think most people think they're ugly and that it would be tougher to sell for that reason and also because potential buyers wouldn't know the implications of inheriting such) or try to get rid of them after 25 years. To my knowledge, that is a very grey area right now. But I've heard I will be the one responsible for getting rid of them and thus, paying to dump them, wherever that may be.
-The payoff? You don't invest any money. I invested $360,000 in my home. I'm not going to **** with its' value by throwing some ugly **** on my roof.
-Sunrun takes them off your home after 20 years with no charge to you.Good to know.
-With the PPA program homes have been selling 3 times as fast with solar and still adding about 17,000 worth of equity to the home. Selling faster (probably because of green nerds) doesn't mean selling at or above what the home would normally sell at.
-Not sure what state you are in but solar is desirable in places with high utility rates, Mass, NY, Hawaii, NJ, Cali, etc.
-Solar gives you the "green home" edge in the market.
I will show you an example. The typical Massachusetts customer pays somewhere between 16-18 cents per KWH with NSTAR. With Solar/Sunrun they can pay anywhere from .03 cents to about 12 cents per KWH. It all depends on how efficient their roof is. But minimally they should see a 20-30% savings their very first month. That solar rate is also locked in so their saving keeps increasing as the local utilities rates will keep rising. Average utilities rise about 3-6% a year
Additionally states don't charge taxes on clean energy so most should see an additional 10 bucks or so each month too.
I'll wait 'til they develop solar "panels" that are the actual shingles that are on your house and don't **** it up aesthetically. I see that time coming in the next 10-20 or so years.
Producing solar power way up north out of the sunbelt for less than the cheapest, oldest, dirtiest low cost coal fired plants cost of production? I declare ********.
Here in Utah we pay $0.09/kWh because we have some common sense. Rates have gone nowhere in 40 years. Move to a state that burdens your power bill into the ground, creating a wake of poverty under the guise of progress, then yeah, it makes all the sense in the world to get away from that.
I'll wait 'til they develop solar "panels" that are the actual shingles that are on your house and don't **** it up aesthetically. I see that time coming in the next 10-20 or so years.