NAOS
Well-Known Member
I don't think that only women want to look good.
Men do too imo
#MarkNasons
I don't think that only women want to look good.
Men do too imo
I don't think that only women want to look good.
Men do too imo
A vague concept shared by every contemporary feminist in academia. I'm sorry it doesn't line up with some WASPy dude's from Utah. Stay in your lane.
Nope-- we must end our nurturing of the societal-construction of the sentiment that it is of paramount importance for a woman to be beautiful. This notion must be deconstructed and gotten rid of/
Maybe to a simpleton like you. That isn't at all what it means. I am chastising the fact that there is a bar being set based off of a social construct (set by men who don't need to meet it themselves) that unfortunately the majority of women will never meet.
This thinking isn't particularly sophisticated.
Who is 'these'? Yes, millions of women are subjected to a delegitimizing culture that they are unaware of. Fortunately, many women are revolting it, and were the first people to bring this up in the first place.
And women also deserve the right to not give a **** about whether some ******* white dude thinks it's important for them to fall within his narrow range of what it means to be beautiful.
I will report you if you keep making these baseless accusations. Get a grip.
I am shaming the system set in place by men-- women are held hostage to it, they aren't to be shamed. What a nuanced, difficult concept to understand amirte!!!!
I don't think the case or verdict is a gender issue and I don't think anyone has said it is.I, for one, am still sort of baffled that a civil jury verdict on a gross violation of privacy is apparently a gender issue.
You seem to have gotten too smart for common sense.A vague concept shared by every contemporary feminist in academia. I'm sorry it doesn't line up with some WASPy dude's from Utah. Stay in your lane.
Nope-- we must end our nurturing of the societal-construction of the sentiment that it is of paramount importance for a woman to be beautiful. This notion must be deconstructed and gotten rid of/
Maybe to a simpleton like you. That isn't at all what it means. I am chastising the fact that there is a bar being set based off of a social construct (set by men who don't need to meet it themselves) that unfortunately the majority of women will never meet.
This thinking isn't particularly sophisticated.
Who is 'these'? Yes, millions of women are subjected to a delegitimizing culture that they are unaware of. Fortunately, many women are revolting it, and were the first people to bring this up in the first place.
And women also deserve the right to not give a **** about whether some ******* white dude thinks it's important for them to fall within his narrow range of what it means to be beautiful.
I will report you if you keep making these baseless accusations. Get a grip.
I am shaming the system set in place by men-- women are held hostage to it, they aren't to be shamed. What a nuanced, difficult concept to understand amirte!!!!
cute.
*So long as they never use their sexuality to impress a man. Dal will decide what is legitimate.
Ah yes, what a misogynist. Wish I could be more like alt13 and deny institutional sexism.
I don't think the case or verdict is a gender issue and I don't think anyone has said it is.
The thread changed along the course of discussion as threads sometimes do.
The case and Erin Andrews are no longer being discussed.
Not once have I said that a woman shouldn't use her sexuality to impress a man. That's completely her decision.
I am criticizing the precedent that men set that unfairly pushes women to use sexuality to impress all peers in society, including men.
To a simpleton like you, the two above points are the same. I'll keep playing chess, you can stick to checkers.
I didn't deny the existence of institutional sexism.
I claimed that your poor application of feminism perpetuates it.
I had no issue with anything you said until you took that extra step too far. The one where you blamed female sexuality.