Got it right, unfortunatelyI told a coworker Laker fan that we either blow them out or they beat us in a squeaker!
Or a coach willing or able to find oneMitchell was the only one with juice the whole game and when the Lakers built the entire defense around shutting him down, we didn't have a counter.
You mean Lebron at the 5? What's this team's answer?You notice how one player was killing the Lakers?
This is sort of where I'm at, although I don't know how optimistic I am that they'll figure out their clutch issues.I'm actually not too bummed about this. This is the type of game the Jazz need to figure out how to deal with. Lebron played a small-ball 5 in the 4th quarter. Jazz players were hedging. If Lebron doesn't make a shot, someone like Austin Reaves is open.
Sadly, I hope it is, as it may be the only way to get ownership/management to blow **** up.Hope it’s not a preview of the post season but if we draw the wrong team in the first round it’s very possible.
Mitchell was the only one with juice the whole game and when the Lakers built the entire defense around shutting him down, we didn't have a counter.
I might be wrong on the westbrook play but on the lebron one i was mentally yelling at gobert to close out on lebron. I knew he was shooting a three and I knew it was going in. I think everyone did. Sure it would allow lebron to get to the paint. But at least then maybe someone can challenge and make him miss. If not, 3 points is more than 2.I don't think this is at all true. He sagged off Westbrook and actually got a decent contest Lebron's three. Everyone in that building knows that if Gobert plays him close that far out that the rim is wide open for him.
Part of the problem is that the team is not only going to have to devise a system for these situations (maybe they have?), they are going to have to trust it.