FWIW Dame has said publicly that Vando is one of the dudes that he'd want to play with.There is some potential there for a deal with Portland. I thought about a trade where we get Hart while sending Olynyk to a third team and that team sending assets to Portland. Miami comes to mind. This would be after trading Beasley to another team. Just thinking out loud here.
Vando and a 1st for Hayes? Hayes is god awful, lol.Trade I most want: Jared Vanderbilt + '23 HOU/BKN/PHI FRP for Killian Hayes
Killian is a young and improving guard under team control. Offensively, I love that he is a pass-first floor general because the players we have are really good finishers and being set-up takes the offense to another level (just look what Conley being on the floor does). I think being around Conley would be good for him. Defensively, Killian would set us up to be a really good defense with Walker in the middle, Lauri as help defender, Ochai and Killian on the perimeter.
The problem is that Killian has been a bad scorer. But, he is shooting 33% from 3 this year, has evened out his drives to the left/right, and improved his mid-range game. I think he will have siginificant improvement over the next few years (drawing fouls, finishing at the rim, and even his 3 ball), but even if he can just maintain his play over the last 25 games he could be awesome. I also think he would get a boost from being surrounded by better players. Kind of like Draymond Green is not valuable on bad teams, but really impactful when the other players are good. If you take his current playmaking/defense and add offensive skills he would be a borderline allstar player.
Pistons hopefully would be open to it because Hayes is redundant with their young core (Already have Ivy and Cunningham) and unless they win the lottery are going to draft another ball dominant player. So Vanderbilt would help balance the roster a little better. I would be willing to overpay for him because there are not a lot of floor generals with size and defense. All you really need is for him to get 10% better as a scorer to have a really good player that makes our roster fit.
No he don't. He was bad until this year but improve a lot this season. Points, passing, he show he can be a good player. And his defense is better than our current PG defense. But i agree with you on the fact that Vando + 1 st is too much.Vando and a 1st for Hayes? Hayes is god awful, lol.
Hayes is extremely inefficient as a scorer/shooter. He's a decent playmaker but only because he has the ball in his hands a lot after Cade's injury.No he don't. He was bad until this year but improve a lot this season. Points, passing, he show he can be a good player. And his defense is better than our current PG defense. But i agree with you on the fact that Vando + 1 st is too much.
I am not guaranteeing that Hayes is an above average starting PG in two years, but IMO it is more than likely to happen. Saying his is awful is not true. He is a really good passer. He wants to just run an offense and would rather pass than shoot. He is a really good defender. His shot is improving. He has always been a good ft shooter and I think he will continue develop (he is 21). Also, remember that he is a pass-first point guard on the Pistons. His greatest contributions are wasted because he doesn't have players to compliment him. How hard is it for anyone to be a plus offensive player with that team, especially one who is trying to set up teammates?Vando and a 1st for Hayes? Hayes is god awful, lol.
I am not guaranteeing that Hayes is an above average starting PG in two years, but IMO it is more than likely to happen. Saying his is awful is not true. He is a really good passer. He wants to just run an offense and would rather pass than shoot. He is a really good defender. His shot is improving. He has always been a good ft shooter and I think he will continue develop (he is 21). Also, remember that he is a pass-first point guard on the Pistons. His greatest contributions are wasted because he doesn't have players to compliment him. How hard is it for anyone to be a plus offensive player with that team, especially one who is trying to set up teammates?
That Brooklyn first is probably mid-20s, so probably not anything important. Vando is fine, but I don't think he is a long-term pillar so I would move him for a player has a chance to be a foundational player and who would be a great fit with the players you are focused on going forward (Lauri, Walker, Ochai, Sexton). Time will tell.
Here is a good article on Killian's shooting. Not good, but moving in the right direction and there is some hope for the long-term. https://www.detroitbadboys.com/2023...e-evaluating-every-killian-hayes-3-point-shot
Anybody else interested in a Fournier/Reddish and two seconds for Beasley/Gay? A recent article indicated that the Knicks are willing to put up the seconds to get something for Reddish who is UFA this season. They don’t want Gay, throw Fontechio or possibly NAW into the deal. Looks like an opportunity to me - these guys value will never be this low again. Fournier is the same player he was a few years ago in Orlando, that we drooled over in trade scenarios. Cam Reddish is 23 and three years removed from being picked #10 overall.
Hayes has a .456 career TS%. He's terrible. Unplayable on a good team.He's just so inefficient as a scorer/shooter and hasn't really improved in those areas since he came into the league.
Woof.Anybody else interested in a Fournier/Reddish and two seconds for Beasley/Gay? A recent article indicated that the Knicks are willing to put up the seconds to get something for Reddish who is UFA this season. They don’t want Gay, throw Fontechio or possibly NAW into the deal. Looks like an opportunity to me - these guys value will never be this low again. Fournier is the same player he was a few years ago in Orlando, that we drooled over in trade scenarios. Cam Reddish is 23 and three years removed from being picked #10 overall.
Yeah giving up a 1st for him would be insane.Hayes has a .456 career TS%. He's terrible. Unplayable on a good team.
When you're that bad a scorer, its not enough to improve a bit. You almost have to become a different player. I don't think Hayes has it in him.
Besides, even "pass-first" point guards have to be able to put the ball in the basket these days. The game has changed, and the 1 has become a scoring position. You can still be a floor general, but if teams ignore you on the 3pt line, it almost doesn't matter how good you are as a passer.
I'd remove Gay and make them add the 2023 Dallas pick. Add in Bolmaro or Udoka (maybe could have value for Udoka given the Robinson injury) to make the trade even from a # of players exchanged standpoint.Anybody else interested in a Fournier/Reddish and two seconds for Beasley/Gay? A recent article indicated that the Knicks are willing to put up the seconds to get something for Reddish who is UFA this season. They don’t want Gay, throw Fontechio or possibly NAW into the deal. Looks like an opportunity to me - these guys value will never be this low again. Fournier is the same player he was a few years ago in Orlando, that we drooled over in trade scenarios. Cam Reddish is 23 and three years removed from being picked #10 overall.
Well physically I don’t see that he’s lost anything, but to each his own. I think also that playing for Thibs may be a factor. These guys have barely even played this season.I'd remove Gay and make them add the 2023 Dallas pick. Add in Bolmaro or Udoka (maybe could have value for Udoka given the Robinson injury) to make the trade even from a # of players exchanged standpoint.
And Fournier is not the same guy. I'm not sure what accelerated his aging so much, but it has happened.
Beasley is so limited and inconsistent imo. I’ll have to do a side by side comparison on bb reference but to my eyes career wise Fournier is the better player.No thanks. If we trade Beasley and take Fournier back we better be getting a pretty nice first not two seconds.
Yep it’s called nuclear Jazz Fusion!Woof.
That's the rare case of turning lemonade into lemons.