What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

PKM said:
Try again..

e6apege8.jpg


Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
By the way.. was pretty funny being at a house worth maybe $80, 000 and having 3 Bentley's in the driveway.
 
is he a much better fit than Siva??? im starting to think most jazzfanz would say that, especially if Isaiah Thomas is being spoken about in exchange for a first, i had to bring up Pierre

where do you Rate Joe Jackson and Larkin in comparison with them?

i really like Joe Jackson, hed be great on the jazz
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
is he a much better fit than Siva??? im starting to think most jazzfanz would say that, especially if Isaiah Thomas is being spoken about in exchange for a first, i had to bring up Pierre

where do you Rate Joe Jackson and Larkin in comparison with them?

i really like Joe Jackson, hed be great on the jazz
Click to expand...

I believe Joe Jackson is not in the year's draft.

On Siva vs Pierre Jackson- Siva can't really shoot. Jackson is an okay shooter. Siva is a little bigger and a better athlete. Both are good on the ball defenders. I believe Siva is a slightly better playmaker. All in all I would rather have Jackson but I prefer bigger PG's so I really don't want any of the tiny PG's.
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
is he a much better fit than Siva??? im starting to think most jazzfanz would say that, especially if Isaiah Thomas is being spoken about in exchange for a first, i had to bring up Pierre

where do you Rate Joe Jackson and Larkin in comparison with them?

i really like Joe Jackson, hed be great on the jazz
Click to expand...

I like Joe Jackson, Pierre, and Larkin pretty similarly.. with Siva just behind them. I don't really care for any of them much, though.
 
None of the PGs of this draft are all that impressive. Schroeder has potential, but it may be a couple years before we see too much of it. The strength of this draft (using the word strength a bit loosely) is really the bigs and the shooting guards.
 
d@!!0n0rcutt said:
Reggie Bullock every day of the week and twice on Sunday. I like Bullock over KCP, Crabbe, Snell, and all these other jokers that call themselves wings in the NBA draft, Otto Porter and Shabazz Mohammed are maybe the only other good wings in this draft. Bullock was always defending the other teams top scorer this last couple seasons. Bullock has what I call the Jazz artichoke in their meal because of his defense, they love their artichokes in any dish so every player in this draft that can defend is the ingredient they look for most but if the entree has mushrooms in it like for instance if the player doesn't rebound well for his position then they won't touch that player or select that dish. So what Locke was saying is there is a lot of those players in this draft that do some things really well and there is more in this draft of really good role players, so you will see teams not go after a player because he doesn't do something that team like so like an entree they will just not order it. That's why we see so many mock drafts all over the place with players.

But I thought about it and I think teams do that every draft but more so in this one because there is so much unknown in this draft.
Click to expand...

Is Bullock that good of a defender? From what I remember he was pretty average. Also he is small for the SF position with an 8'6" wingspan. Notably Snell's standing reach is 8'9.5". Also surprisingly Snell's lane agility time was a full second faster. Though his coach saying "he needs to overcome how hard he plays- isn't good."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top