Following potential 2013 draftees
- Thread starter Dr. Jones
- Start date
I still see us taking that 7-footer from Gonzaga, but I bet we'd take Otto Porter if we could.
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
Just saw a highlight video on this kid, and looks like an interesting prospect. He seems to dribble very low to the ground and seems very quick with some great ball handling skills. I have a feeling he will go between 20 to 30th pick in the draft, and from what I saw it looks like he shoots 48% from 3 on 6.5 attempts. If true that's damn good.
PKM, was wondering what you think of him?
Hey Guys!!
I just had a Epiphany today when I was reading Chad Ford's Big Board, listing Burke at #15 and Robinson III at #22. With the way GSW are sliding and our home court stretch coming up, we could very well be picking at around those numbers, with the GSW pick at #15 and our own pick at #22 respectively.
So why not pick Burke at #15 and Robinson III at #22? They fill our needs at PG and SF, and they'll be BPA according to Ford's ranking at least (DX had them at #17 and #20), so we're not reaching in any way shape or form. Plus they're already teammates, so they would already have that chemistry thing going.
Also in terms of risk/reward thing, we're going for a sure thing in Burke (high assists, low TO's, can shoot 3's) and a high-risk product in Robinson who seems to have great potential. So from an investment portfolio POV we're spreading the risk, not putting all our eggs in 1 basket.
What do you guys think?
I just had a Epiphany today when I was reading Chad Ford's Big Board, listing Burke at #15 and Robinson III at #22. With the way GSW are sliding and our home court stretch coming up, we could very well be picking at around those numbers, with the GSW pick at #15 and our own pick at #22 respectively.
So why not pick Burke at #15 and Robinson III at #22? They fill our needs at PG and SF, and they'll be BPA according to Ford's ranking at least (DX had them at #17 and #20), so we're not reaching in any way shape or form. Plus they're already teammates, so they would already have that chemistry thing going.
Also in terms of risk/reward thing, we're going for a sure thing in Burke (high assists, low TO's, can shoot 3's) and a high-risk product in Robinson who seems to have great potential. So from an investment portfolio POV we're spreading the risk, not putting all our eggs in 1 basket.
What do you guys think?
We draft?
orangello
Well-Known Member
Yes, nearly everyday. Nothing actually comes of it but we still draft in our minds.
Park Bites
Well-Known Member
I would put favors #1 kanter #3 behind Noel. based on when they came out of college.
Weezur
Well-Known Member
1 & 2, but I'm a homer.
Knowing what we know now? I'd say, #2 and #3: Noel, Favors, Kanter, Shabazz, McLemore...
But I think scouts would bunch Kanter in with Austin, Zeller and Len, meaning Kanter might be in the 5 - 8 range.
But I think scouts would bunch Kanter in with Austin, Zeller and Len, meaning Kanter might be in the 5 - 8 range.
