orangello
Well-Known Member
If this is the case we shouldn't draft a pg in the first round. This might not be the deepest draft, but still say we can get a couple good players at other positions.
I've been saying this for months.
If this is the case we shouldn't draft a pg in the first round. This might not be the deepest draft, but still say we can get a couple good players at other positions.
Does he have the ability to play both like Hayward?
And Walker wasn't as much of a PG, as efficient, young, or as big as Burke. If Michigan wins the national title, Burke goes top-5.
No but significantly faster and every bit the on court leader Burke is. Walker is putting up a 19 PER in his 2nd season, besting any of our c4, quite impressive. Both have their strong points and are about equal prospects imo.
I've been saying this for months.
And although Burke was really clutch this last game, I don't think he has really done much to improve his stock during the Tournament.
I say GRIII or Saric and best big with the second (Olynk, Plumlee, WCS, Austin, Gobert, Withey Adams) then Craft with the second round
Get a good SF out of this draft and since there are a lot of bigs take BPA with the second.
In the second round it is a crap shoot any way. Why not Craft only looking for a 3rd pg any way.
I agree with this. What we need is a PG who can get into the lane, and Burke struggled with that all game.