What's new
By:

Following potential 2013 draftees

Ok, may be it was a stretch to get Green with our 2nd. DX had him at #31.

How about if we get McCollum/Schroeder @ #14 to play PG and Green @ #21 to play back up PG/SG?

Is that too much of a stretch? Or do you guys prefer Saric/Karasev @ #21?

(this is assuming Greek Freak is gone between #14 - #21)
 
Green intrigues me but he's rather down on the list for me in relation to Adetekundo, Schroeder, McCollum, Olynyk, and Austin.
 
I think the rule is to always maximize each pick rather than planning around a combination of players at 2 different picks. At #14, if McCollum, Austin and Adetokunbo are there, you take the one you think the most highly of regardless of who might or might not be there are #21 (e.g., Schroeder, Green, etc.). For example, in 2010 Cleveland could have thought--"Hey, we could get an 'elite' wing and still get an 'elite' PG with our first-round picks if we took Derrick Williams and Brandon Knight at #1 and #4 instead of Kyrie Irving at #1 and whatever is available at #4..." Obviously, that would have been a royal mistake.

So normally you make every pick like it's your only pick, and maximize its value.

Just a friendly reminder from Captain Obvious.

Karasev, Green or Goodwin might be there at #21.
 
Catchall said:
I think the rule is to always maximize each pick rather than planning around a combination of players at 2 different picks. At #14, if McCollum, Austin and Adetokunbo are there, you take the one you think the most highly of regardless of who might or might not be there are #21 (e.g., Schroeder, Green, etc.). For example, in 2010 Cleveland could have thought--"Hey, we could get an 'elite' wing and still get an 'elite' PG with our first-round picks if we took Derrick Williams and Brandon Knight at #1 and #4 instead of Kyrie Irving at #1 and whatever is available at #4..." Obviously, that would have been a royal mistake.

So normally you make every pick like it's your only pick, and maximize its value.

Just a friendly reminder from Captain Obvious.

Karasev, Green or Goodwin might be there at #21.
Click to expand...

... and that was my intended question really - which of those would you pick?

Karasev to me seems like a double up of who we already have in Hayward - do we need another "soft" SF?

Green can come in our 2nd unit and give us that scoring punch. He can handle the ball as well, so he can double up as our 2nd/3rd PG.

Goodwin... he's a bit "meh" at this point. Similarly with Saric...
 
Hotttnickkk said:
... and that was my intended question really - which of those would you pick?

Karasev to me seems like a double up of who we already have in Hayward - do we need another "soft" SF?

Green can come in our 2nd unit and give us that scoring punch. He can handle the ball as well, so he can double up as our 2nd/3rd PG.

Goodwin... he's a bit "meh" at this point. Similarly with Saric...
Click to expand...

Goodwin is the risk/reward guy in the group. Many scouts believe he's one of those guys that makes a better pro than college player.. so he may not be there.

Liked what I saw of Karasev but seemed to have a very limited ceiling. . SARIC I have no opinion of..
 
Catchall said:
I think the rule is to always maximize each pick rather than planning around a combination of players at 2 different picks. At #14, if McCollum, Austin and Adetokunbo are there, you take the one you think the most highly of regardless of who might or might not be there are #21 (e.g., Schroeder, Green, etc.). For example, in 2010 Cleveland could have thought--"Hey, we could get an 'elite' wing and still get an 'elite' PG with our first-round picks if we took Derrick Williams and Brandon Knight at #1 and #4 instead of Kyrie Irving at #1 and whatever is available at #4..." Obviously, that would have been a royal mistake.

So normally you make every pick like it's your only pick, and maximize its value.

Just a friendly reminder from Captain Obvious.

Karasev, Green or Goodwin might be there at #21.
Click to expand...

I actually thought Cleveland should have gone kanter and knight.
 
the Jazz should do the age old smoke screen with McCollum and leak info that doctors found a problem with his foot that was broken. I am sure there is a way to leak that info with out it being traced back to utah. stuff like this happens every year
 
Xthren said:
the Jazz should do the age old smoke screen with McCollum and leak info that doctors found a problem with his foot that was broken. I am sure there is a way to leak that info with out it being traced back to utah. stuff like this happens every year
Click to expand...

Yea, the Jazz seem like the kind of organization to do that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top