Following potential 2013 draftees

[Fishsticks]

satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

So?

 

[UGLI baby]

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

So true. Something I didn't learn until my mid 40's. Meeting my wife certainly helped with that.


posted from my htc one using tapaBONGO

 

[Hantlers]

satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

I hope you realize you're one of the major reasons this site has gone to ****. Do us all a favor and quit posting.

 

[The Midnight]

So true. Something I didn't learn until my mid 40's. Meeting my wife certainly helped with that.


posted from my htc one using tapaBONGO

Bless you brother, bless you...

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

It's not hate it's called being a realist. You don't draft a position just because it's a need unless that is BPA. No way in hell is there going to be a pg available to take at 14. That's a clippers move.

 

[b_line]

satisfying because?

You do know about half this board is calling for us to pick a PG in this draft right? As unless you've been hiding under a rock somewhere, McCollum is going top #10 - meaning we've got no chance at getting him.

You can feed on hate, but in the end it'll eat you up.

Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

It's not hate it's called being a realist. You don't draft a position just because it's a need unless that is BPA. No way in hell is there going to be a pg available to take at 14. That's a clippers move.

The part highlighted ment to say there won't be a pg available at 14 that will be BPA.

 

[The Midnight]

I hope you realize you're one of the major reasons this site has gone to ****. Do us all a favor and quit posting.

?? So you agree with Thee Jazz Fanz that "I would find it extremely satisfying if Schroeder went on pick #15 right after our pick" ??

Who would you rather take at #14, may I ask??

 

[The Midnight]

Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.

Yeah, and a lot of people are also calling for Schroeder at #14.

 

[UGLI baby]

I hope you realize you're one of the major reasons this site has gone to ****. Do us all a favor and quit posting.

False



posted from my htc one using tapaBONGO

 

[Thee Jazz Fan]

Seems to me like a lot of people are calling for bpa. That is what I would want. If it is a poi t guard, that would be ok. But I don't think you should miss out on a better player just because the team needs a point guard. That's how you end up with Raul Lopez and Carlos arroyo.

Reminds me of when the Bobcats picked up Felton, and past up on Granger.

 

[b_line]

Reminds me of when the Bobcats picked up Felton, and past up on Granger.

Or when Kahn picked every point guard available except Stephen curry?