What's new
By:

Following potential 2014 draftees

They're good but not as good as advertised.
Randle is too below the rim and the Harrison's sulk too much.

Oh.. and **** off.

Sent from the JazzFanz app
 
PKM said:
Serious post.

I would not take Randle before 10.
I would not take WCS before 20.
I would not take either Harrison in the lottery.
Young is the best pro prospect on this UK team... and I'd take him around 12/13.
Click to expand...

This game is hard to watch right now.
 
orangello said:
Ummmm, not quite.

Please tell me why you'd rather have Gordon, Smart, Vonleh, Harris, Saric, WCS, McDermott and Hood before Young.


TIA
Click to expand...

I'm going to go ahead and say that it's because the athletic shooter that is Young, is shooting under 40% for the year. Or at least he was before this game tonight.

Dude shoots a lot, and doesn't make very many. He has a nice looking shot, but I'm a results driven kind of guy...I'm just not seeing that many results from him. Plus, his percentages should be better considering teams are doubling down on Randle quite often, which will leave other guys open, and Young does benefit from that on occasion. I can definitely see his talent, but I'm not impressed by his results so far.
 
Poythress is doing a lot of good things as well. Like the hustle plays that he is providing. I could see him as a valuable player off the bench.
 
orangello said:
Poythress is doing a lot of good things as well. Like the hustle plays that he is providing. I could see him as a valuable player off the bench.
Click to expand...

No, no, and no.

I want nothing to do with him. Waste of talent. I don't care how good these Kentucky guys are supposed to be, he can't even start. He has all of this talent, but won't do jack **** with it. He doesn't play the 3 that well...he's an undersized 4 who doesn't want to play the 4 position. Bleh.
 
Hantlers said:
I'm going to go ahead and say that it's because the athletic shooter that is Young, is shooting under 40% for the year. Or at least he was before this game tonight.

Dude shoots a lot, and doesn't make very many. He has a nice looking shot, but I'm a results driven kind of guy...I'm just not seeing that many results from him. Plus, his percentages should be better considering teams are doubling down on Randle quite often, which will leave other guys open, and Young does benefit from that on occasion. I can definitely see his talent, but I'm not impressed by his results so far.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree. I'm just asking who else is a better pick than him that the Jazz might be looking at if they miss out on the top 5?
 
Hantlers said:
No, no, and no.

I want nothing to do with him. Waste of talent. I don't care how good these Kentucky guys are supposed to be, he can't even start. He has all of this talent, but won't do jack **** with it. He doesn't play the 3 that well...he's an undersized 4 who doesn't want to play the 4 position. Bleh.
Click to expand...

I didn't say anything about where I would pick him. I'd certainly take a 2nd round flier on him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top