Hantlers
Well-Known Member
Then so will like ten consecutive rings.
Probably not. By the time they're all good enough to be consistently solid, we wouldn't be able to afford all of them.
But I just like being a negative *******, so ignore me.
Then so will like ten consecutive rings.
Agree, but same can be said about anyone.
Sure Wiggins athleticism is the elite of elite. His upside is obvious, but is that enough?
Randle is putting up the best overall stats for pts and boards, but will it translate?
Exum looks great against Aussie's, but lets be honest.. how many of those guys will one day be playing in the NBA?
Yes. But next year's is AWESOME!!!!111!!In other words, this darft sucks?
How many of the guys that Parker, Embiid, Randle are playing will be in the NBA. Sure it's probably higher than the Aussie's, but it's not like a ton of college players are gonna be in the league.
Yes. But next year's is AWESOME!!!!111!!
UGLI was right?!?!?! No, impossible.
Probably not. By the time they're all good enough to be consistently solid, we wouldn't be able to afford all of them.
But I just like being a negative *******, so ignore me.
making the assumption that Burke is going to get the Jazz a few more wins who would you take in the 5 to8 range?
There are so many things to take into consideration
- Exum he is redundant to Burks is he keeps playing this way.
- Smart welll Burke seems to be the real deal PG for the Jazz
- Gordon is he a 3 or a 4 would have to play the 3 (This is my choice)
- Saric no thank you cant shoot
- Vonleh just gives us a bunch of depth in the front court
- LaVine i like a lot but again burks is playing well
Young Hood Walker