I'd say there are at least a dozen people on this board who understand the game better than Locke. There are guys who haven't been around for a while like Kenwood and Billy Shelby that understand things with the CBA that Locke is clueless about. Just wait until the next article he writes on the offseason, where he exposes himself pretty badly. Like I said, Locke understands numbers and how certain patterns might affect things, but his overall knowledge of the game is limited. Of course, you have to have a good understanding of the game yourself to be able to pick up on that, so I understand why some people disagree.
.
I do find it pretty humorous that Locke admits he hates the college game and doesn't watch it, and yet some people still believe he's the authority on all things b-ball. Looking at data can help you assess players, but I don't know how anyone can put too much faith in someone who doesn't watch the players.