What's new

Following potential 2015 draftees

I am a HUGE booker fan but the dude is 6-6. He is not charles barkely but is a decent back up. Would love to see him stay on the Jazz but Looney, Lyles and portis have much higher ceilings then booker. You know what you get from booker and the Jazz have him for 1 more season. That would give them a chance to develope another big.

To be perfectly honest if Stanly Johnson was available i would grab him and look at developing him as a stretch 4. His abilities would by fantastic for that. He could also go to the 3 when a bigger line up was needed. Right now Johnson is the payer i want at our draft position but I bet he is gone.
 
Porzingis is a perfect fit for ORL.


Porzingis is a perfect fit for just about every team. Everyone wants a mobile stretch-big who isn't a total loss on defense. It opens up the floor for everyone and everything else.

I guarantee the Jazz want a stretch big like Porzingis. Bad. The value-pick version of Porzingis in this draft is Portis, imo,..if he can show he can shoot consistently.
 
[video]https://insider.espn.go.com/nba/draft2015/insider/story/_/id/12689816/nba-draft-360-degree-profile-bobby-portis-draft-stock-pro-future

The scouting perspective

Portis is a valuable commodity in this NBA draft. He is a young big man with good size, some athletic ability, a reliable midrange jump shot and very good motor. Even if he doesn't become an NBA star, he has all the attributes teams look for, which could keep him in the NBA for a decade.

The 20-year-old Portis is a sturdy 6-foot-11, 242 pounds, but is not an explosive athlete by NBA standards. However, he tries to play with energy, runs the floor hard and is a quick second jumper around the basket. And because he establishes good position away from his teammates' shots and "wedges" well, his 14 percent offensive rebound rate this past season was 36th-best in the country.

Another bonus with Portis is his shooting ability for a player his size. While his 47 percent behind the arc came from a small sample size, he did make a healthy 38 percent of his 2-point jump shots this season and they accounted for 53 percent of his attempts. He has also made 74 percent of his free throws in two years as a Razorback.

Although Portis' finishing percentage at the rim was a healthy 75 percent this season, his lack of explosiveness will manifest itself at the NBA level. He'll struggle initially around the rim, in my opinion. But he has a hard-to-block turnaround jump shot that could develop into a good weapon in time because of his touch.

I don't expect Portis to be a rim protector on the defensive end in the NBA. Rather, he'll be called upon to be solid in screen-and-roll coverages and in isolation situations. Because he stays engaged, plays with energy and tries to move his feet, he'll be more than serviceable on that end of the court. And he's been coached not to foul. The effort to be good defensively is there on the tape.

Portis struggled a bit late in the season, but because of his body of work all season (and Kentucky's platoon system) he was voted SEC Player of the Year. I see him drafted in the middle of the first round, meaning it's likely he will end up on a playoff team at worst. Given his age, his size and shooting touch, that team may be getting a gift.

-- Fran Fraschilla

"He's solid," one scout said of Portis. "And that's not a dig at him. He's solid at everything he does. I don't see a lot of holes in his games. If you want to reach for the stars, this isn't the player. But if you say, 'I want a guy that at the very least will be a solid rotation guy and at the very best will be the fourth- or fifth-best starter on my team,' I don't think you can go wrong.
-- Chad Ford
 
To be perfectly honest if Stanly Johnson was available i would grab him and look at developing him as a stretch 4. His abilities would by fantastic for that. He could also go to the 3 when a bigger line up was needed. Right now Johnson is the payer i want at our draft position but I bet he is gone.

I agree with Johnson as a stretch-4. It's a tough transition, but Johnson could do it. It's basically like Draymond Green or Harrison Barnes.
 
Nice post on Portis. Will rep when I can. Think of a more mobile, harder working and smarter version of Andray Blatche. Portis is also a good passer. I'm okay with Lyles too.
 
Booker doesn't shoot, score or rebound well enough to replace what we lost with Kanter. The Jazz may not keep him, tbh. Truthfully, Booker isn't that good.

Really? I thought he filled in really well for Favors the last couple of games. Brings a nice burst of energy off the bench with an improving outside game too.
 
Booker doesn't shoot, score or rebound well enough to replace what we lost with Kanter. The Jazz may not keep him, tbh. Truthfully, Booker isn't that good.

I disagree with this.

I agree with Johnson as a stretch-4. It's a tough transition, but Johnson could do it. It's basically like Draymond Green or Harrison Barnes.

I agree with this.

Really? I thought he filled in really well for Favors the last couple of games. Brings a nice burst of energy off the bench with an improving outside game too.

This.
 
I agree with everyone else, just take BPA, but I also think one of the guys were are discussing is going to be the best player available. I do think some of this depends on whether we keep Booker and whether or not we can get one of either Pleiss or Tomic, though.

I would try and package the 2017 GSW first-rounder, OKC first-rounder, and #11 or #12 (wherever it ends up) to move up a couple of spots and draft Johnson. I would LOVE Hezonja, but I think he goes top-7, Porzingis could be a target if he fell to 8 or 9.

Looney is a guy that I have warmed up to, went 22-53 from three this year, is 6'9, and rebounds the ball well. He was up to #6 in Chad Ford's big board at one point in February/March, fwiw.
 
You're thinking too much about what the drafted big would do for us in the present instead of the future. He could be the long term 3rd big. It's not guaranteed that Booker will be here after next season. Besides, I think Portis could be as good or better than Booker as a rookie.

And you could say this about the wing position too. We've got Hayward, Hood, Burks and Ingles. Are we really going to use this pick on a 5th wing? Using your logic, the Jazz should only be looking at PGs.
Agree. I love Booker's intensity. But skill-wise, Jazz would be better served by having a strecth-4 because we don't get a lot of range from Favors and none from Gobert. Also, as you said, there's no guarantee he stays in 2016. You can't break the bank for him...not with Gobert coming off his rookie deal soon and bigger payouts for Favors and Hayward coming up. But a LOT of teams are going to overspend in 2016. It will be like letting coeds loose at Chuck-A-Rama. Booker could get a much higher offer than what we want to pay.
 
Back
Top