No, I guess not. Could have just said 'not your typical UK player'. Sorry, bro
Thanks. Cool of ya to retract.
No, I guess not. Could have just said 'not your typical UK player'. Sorry, bro
What does this mean?Lyles could play with both of them because they will erase defensive issues on the perimeter. Nah..
What does this mean?
I'm liking Okafor more. He's getting to the FT line a lot now (17 attempts last game) and looks like a decent passer.
Overall, the top 3 looks pretty solid actually.
I'm starting to view Lyles as the proper recipient of the Vonleh hype
I was watching Vonleh quite a bit last year. I like Lyles more than Vonleh. Vonleh's reactions always looked a bit slow. Part of his appeal was his length and some rim protection on defense. Lyles is smoother, a better passer and looks to be more consistent shooter.
The future of the Jazz looks to be Exum - - Hayward - - Gobert.
If we filled in the blanks with Winslow and Favors, we'd be great defensively, but our shooting would be so-so.
If we filled in the blanks with Burks/Hood and Porzings/Lyles, we'd be good offensively, and our defense would be average or slightly above.
Kanter is good, but I don't think he is quite what we'll need to reach the next level.
I'd love to come out of this draft with a shiny new SG and a PF who can score and facilitate. I'm a fan of both Hezonja and Winslow at the SG, and I like both Porzingis and Lyles as PFs. This assumes we don't get in the top 3.
Then draft Johnson and get both defense and shooting.
bam
......yeah, I can see that. I think Winslow is going to be better than Johnson for some reason, but they're very close. I think Johnson needs to play SF. He's like 240 lbs. We've already got mad max playing SF.