I'd rather have Russell than Johnson if we are starting Gobert. We going to need shooters who can space the floor. Also going to need another playmaker if Exum doesn't pan out. Russell Is pretty good Exum insurance since he can be a 2 or 1.
The odds of Johnson working as hard on his game as Butler has since he came into the NBA are slim to none doe. Dude has developed at an otherworldly rate. Johnson's got dat much higher base doe.
"Just gotta keep at it, young fella" - kkk
I'd rather have Russell than Johnson if we are starting Gobert. We going to need shooters who can space the floor. Also going to need another playmaker if Exum doesn't pan out. Russell Is pretty good Exum insurance since he can be a 2 or 1.
Well... I've given it some thought, and decided my guy is WCS. how amazing would it be to have a rotation of Favors Gobert and Booker, and I think Booker will only get better
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The odds of Johnson working as hard on his game as Butler has since he came into the NBA are slim to none doe. Dude has developed at an otherworldly rate. Johnson's got dat much higher base doe.
"Just gotta keep at it, young fella" - kkk
I'm fine with getting WCS, especially if they do something with Kanter. There's few players who can guard bigs and then step out and be proficient defending on the perimeter. It's also the reason that I'd be fine with trying Porzingis at the 3 if they draft him instead of just saying that he's strictly a stretch 4. He looks like he might have enough athleticism to do it. Gobert, Favors, Porzingis, Hayward and Exum. . . essentially the same type of lineup as if Antetokounmpo were drafted instead of Burke.
Go after Gerald Green, Danny Green and/or DeMarre Carroll to round out the wing rotation. If they don't keep Kanter (or if he comes back cheap), I bet one of them could be acquired.
I still don't see why people keep putting WCS in their big boards for the Jazz especially after Rudy looks more and more like a future star. To me he looks absolutely redundant.