What's new
By:

Following Potential 2025 Draftees

Kon is going to be fun to watch without Flagg. Such a great basketball player and really has a chance to shine as the #1 dude. I might take him as high as 5 which is crazy considering his lack of athleticism and length.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
Kon is going to be fun to watch without Flagg. Such a great basketball player and really has a chance to shine as the #1 dude. I might take him as high as 5 which is crazy considering his lack of athleticism and length.
Click to expand...
It's just weird because he's the type of prospect who usually goes in the 20s, but I think he's probably better than Kasparas at this point.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
It's just weird because he's the type of prospect who usually goes in the 20s, but I think he's probably better than Kasparas at this point.
Click to expand...
I was thinking about a luke kennard comp, which is lazy (white wings from duke), but i also think it's appropriate. i do like Kon better as an overall basketball player - i think he's a better scorer from inside the 3 point line, has better feel as a passer and is a better defender. he's been much better than freshman kennard at Duke, where kennard exploded as a sophomore.

tangent. in checking Kennard's NBA production (12th overall pick after his soph season) to see if a rich man's version would be worth taking as high as 5 or 6, I noticed this:

Kennard's 3pt% per season starting his 4th season in the NBA:
45%
45%
49%
45%
46%

Good hell. that is insane 3pt shooting greatness and consistency. however, that's pretty much all he does - his 3pt attempt rate has been between about 65% and 80% over that time and has rarely averaged double figure scoring.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
I was thinking about a luke kennard comp, which is lazy (white wings from duke), but i also think it's appropriate. i do like Kon better as an overall basketball player - i think he's a better scorer from inside the 3 point line, has better feel as a passer and is a better defender. he's been much better than freshman kennard at Duke, where kennard exploded as a sophomore.

tangent. in checking Kennard's NBA production (12th overall pick after his soph season) to see if a rich man's version would be worth taking as high as 5 or 6, I noticed this:

Kennard's 3pt% per season starting his 4th season in the NBA:
45%
45%
49%
45%
46%

Good hell. that is insane 3pt shooting greatness and consistency.
Click to expand...
I think Kon is closer to Bane than Kennardz at least stylistically
 
Kon is a very fundamentally sound player who plays hard and has size. I don’t see the pop to justify anything top-10. That **** he was doing against Georgia Tech is not anything he will sniff in the NBA.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
I think Kon is closer to Bane than Kennardz at least stylistically
Click to expand...
I'm warming up to him... in part because I don't see a lot of guys I consider good upside swings in his draft range and I think he's an nba player. He also struggled with his shooting a bit (well relative to his reputation) early in the season. He's just such a rectangular body. I wonder if he has baby fat that he might game a touch of quickness if he dropped. I think Bane is a better athlete but also likely a bit shorter.

He just has an odd body and we don't see guys that look like that. I think Bane is a really good comp for his ceiling outcomes. Back half of the lotto is a fine place for him in this draft.
 
I'm currently at a point in this draft where I think there are going to be a lot of good players that come from this draft, but I just have no idea who they will be, lol.

There are a lot of really productive young guys with unclear fit in the NBA, extremely young guys with inconsistent production/roles, and foreign guys that are harder to project.
 
SoberasHotRod said:
I'm currently at a point in this draft where I think there are going to be a lot of good players that come from this draft, but I just have no idea who they will be, lol.

There are a lot of really productive young guys with unclear fit in the NBA, extremely young guys with inconsistent production/roles, and foreign guys that are harder to project.
Click to expand...
Its kind of a grab bag from like 7/8 to 20 something. I think Jase becomes a big riser but I think someone good falls to the minny pick... would be over the moon if it was him. But like Fears, Traore, Richardson... any could pop. Queen might be Zach Randolph/Sengun or just a fun bench guy. I have no idea on the international guys but the idea of some of them are kinda cool.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
I was thinking about a luke kennard comp, which is lazy (white wings from duke), but i also think it's appropriate. i do like Kon better as an overall basketball player - i think he's a better scorer from inside the 3 point line, has better feel as a passer and is a better defender. he's been much better than freshman kennard at Duke, where kennard exploded as a sophomore.

tangent. in checking Kennard's NBA production (12th overall pick after his soph season) to see if a rich man's version would be worth taking as high as 5 or 6, I noticed this:

Kennard's 3pt% per season starting his 4th season in the NBA:
45%
45%
49%
45%
46%

Good hell. that is insane 3pt shooting greatness and consistency. however, that's pretty much all he does - his 3pt attempt rate has been between about 65% and 80% over that time and has rarely averaged double figure scoring.
Click to expand...

He’s bigger than Kennard, though that comp came to mind for me as well.

Maybe the hope is that he’s like a Temu version of Luka. The knock on him is his defense.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
Just saw the Full DX mock, it has Fleming 21 to the Jazz!
Click to expand...
Everytime I watch him on the highlights I am just amazed at how huge he is and how well he moves. The shot looks fluid... I have a hard time seeing him not land in the lotto after measurement and testing. No idea on his personality at all but if that stuff checks out I think Cy will have another hit on the resume.
 
I can’t remember if I posted this or not, but one thing I really like about Richardson is his lack of turnovers. I think that’s a translatable trait.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top