Drives me nuts. This whole thing drives me nuts.The tendency that really irks me is when someone uses without-shoes measurements when they don't like a guy, and with-shoes measurements when they like someone else.
What planet are you from? Suddenly Michael Jordan struggled because of his size? Watch a ****ing game, dude.Still not tall for nba standards.
Never said anything about anyone struggling. Any was given as an example of a tall wing. At 6-4 - 6-5 he’s not tallWhat planet are you from? Suddenly Michael Jordan struggled because of his size? Watch a ****ing game, dude.
There is more to size than height. I said I like big, athletic, scoring wings. Ant be big. Long limbs as wellStill not tall for nba standards.
Ant was given as an example of a big wing.Never said anything about anyone struggling. Any was given as an example of a tall wing. At 6-4 - 6-5 he’s not tall
Furthermore, Conley isn’t even 6’ without shoes, but he gets to be listed as 6’ 1”.Donovan started out 6-3 (which would be the standard throughout NBA history), then as people tired of him (and to be fair, as the NBA started emphasizing without-shoes measurements more), he became 6-1 and the same as Conley.
There is also the question of length and strength that people usually leave out. Ant is strong as hell and uses it.Ant was given as an example of a big wing.
Not tall
i think more importantly, he has great positional size. as you mentioned, part of that just having an elite body more than just height.There is more to size than height. I said I like big, athletic, scoring wings. Ant be big. Long limbs as well
Ant is the same size as Michael Jordan.
He most definitely is not. Try 6'3''.
I know you’re doing your schtick or whatever but we have facts here. 6’ 3.75” without shoes: https://www.nba.com/stats/draft/combine-anthro?SeasonYear=2003-04He most definitely is not. Try 6'3''.