What's new

Following Potential 2025 Draftees

I don't think I can justify in my head having Fears that high, but everything else I can see the logic. .
He's incredibly young and playing really well in a tough conference. I dont know how you cant have him high at the moment.

The 3pt% doesnt concern me too much given he's a very good FT shooter and the shot looks fine.
 
Reminder that VJ Edgecombe measured out at last year's Nike Hoop Summit at 6'3" (w/o shoes), 185 lbs, with a 6'5" wingspan. If that's what he looks like at this year's Combine, then his physical comp would be like a Monta Ellis with a couple more inches of length. I have a hard time seeing him go 3rd if he measures that small and isn't perceived to have true lead-guard skills.
 
He's incredibly young and playing really well in a tough conference. I dont know how you cant have him high at the moment.

The 3pt% doesnt concern me too much given he's a very good FT shooter and the shot looks fine.

I could be a little lower on him because the live games I've watched have been bad. His highs have been really impressive though, so I get the potential.

Just looking at his game logs though and he's been vey inconsistent. He's shooting 40%fg% and 25% 3pt% in conference play and his team has been horrible. He's also not big or a good defender or an amazing passer or anything else that helps to raise his floor.
 
Reminder that VJ Edgecombe measured out at last year's Nike Hoop Summit at 6'3" (w/o shoes), 185 lbs, with a 6'5" wingspan. If that's what he looks like at this year's Combine, then his physical comp would be like a Monta Ellis with a couple more inches of length. I have a hard time seeing him go 3rd if he measures that small and isn't perceived to have true lead-guard skills.

Reminder that those were incorrect measurements that they updated Of course we can just wait until the combine, but I find it funny how people so often cite these incorrect numbers. Measurements matter, but sometimes I get the impression that they matter more to winning internet arguments than they do on the court.
 
Reminder that those were incorrect measurements that they updated Of course we can just wait until the combine, but I find it funny how people so often cite these incorrect numbers.

The numbers were replaced with measurements in shoes. These initial numbers were not shown to be incorrect.
 
The numbers were replaced with measurements in shoes. These initial numbers were not shown to be incorrect.

Shoes, no shoes does not make a difference in the wingspan. Anyways....I don't think it really matters if he's a half inch shorter or taller than expected. I care about how he plays basketball and it's completely different that Ellis. Agonizing over miniscule details is pointless.
 
Back
Top