I can't believe I'm falling for this troll attempt, but nobody elevated Ace over Lauri. It's simply talking about a player's strengths and weakness. Ace's strengths are exactly what Lauri's weakness is, so why are we comparing the two? If I said Ace was a bad comparison to Gobert because he's a different player with different strengths and weaknesses that is in no way shape or form saying he's better than Gobert. When people compare prospects to players, they are not literally comparing how good they are at the moment....but of course, anyone with half a brain would understand that.
Following Potential 2025 Draftees
- Thread starter Elizah Huge
- Start date
I can't believe I'm falling for this troll attempt, but nobody elevated Ace over Lauri. It's simply talking about a player's strengths and weakness. Ace's strengths are exactly what Lauri's weakness is, so why are we comparing the two? If I said Ace was a bad comparison to Gobert because he's a different player with different strengths and weaknesses that is in no way shape or form saying he's better than Gobert. When people compare prospects to players, they are not literally comparing how good they are at the moment....but of course, anyone with half a brain would understand that.
HadAnEffectHere
Well-Known Member
Derrick Favors got a ton of post-ups in college simply because he was huge and had good hands and good touch and was much better than other college players so that was the best option for Georgia Tech.
In the NBA, he got very few post-ups after his first few years simply because he wasn't good at enough at those to justify it.
I don't think Ace's skillset translates well at all to iso scoring in the NBA. He can't even get good shots in college and his efficiency is below average even for a college player. I think he'll eventually be a completely off-ball player except against switches against very small guys.
Kind of similar to Harrison Barnes as well.
In the NBA, he got very few post-ups after his first few years simply because he wasn't good at enough at those to justify it.
I don't think Ace's skillset translates well at all to iso scoring in the NBA. He can't even get good shots in college and his efficiency is below average even for a college player. I think he'll eventually be a completely off-ball player except against switches against very small guys.
Kind of similar to Harrison Barnes as well.
Barnes makes sense to me. Chances are he'll be a mediocre scorer like Barnes was in DAL or become a useful role player like Barnes was elsewhere. Still, Ace has a lot of potential to me more (or less). He's kind of a poor man's version of Jabari Smith as a prospect. I'm surprised that Jabari isn't better than he is, but if Ace ended up as good as Jabari is right now I would say that's about as expected or even consider it an above average outcome.
The Lauri comparison makes no sense to me because his strengths are completely different to Lauri's and Lauri isn't Lauri just because he can't create shots. Barnes and Smith cannot create, that doesn't mean they are Lauri. That comparison essentially ignores the best aspects of either player which are completely different.
First off, comparing the success of a post player from college to NBA the same way as an isolation perimeter player is ridiculous. The NBA doesnt want post players unless they are incredibly elite at it and arent interested in really fostering that development unless the players shows they are exceptional at it early on.
2nd of all, Favors didnt get those touches early on because he was on a team with Paul Millsap, Al Jefferson, and Enes Kanter. He was stuck inbetween positions all of his career in Utah. At one point they wanted him to be a mid-range shooting PF, then they wanted him to be a center, then they wanted him to be a PF again who could maybe shoot 3's.
3rd. A 6'10 iso player isnt going to be successful because they are great at creating separation and getting easy shots. They excel at hitting difficult shots and then using their size near the basket to be able to convert.
Peja's son is currently carrying Cal to a win 2OT in the ACC tourney. Lawal has had some great moments in this game as well.
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
I’d say he hit on Hood in the early 20’s. And think his career would’ve been better had he not had all the minor injuries
A 6-10 JC I’m totally drooling over. How would anyone stop a 6-10 JC from scoring?
I’ll also take a 6-10 Barnes, but imo I don’t see Barnes in Ace.
What is that 20 minutes out of 2000-3000 minutes. I’m sure there are countless minutes of him looking awkward, trying to create, I know I’ve seen plenty 20 minutes of highlights doesn’t prove he’s a strong creator. I wouldn’t say he’s a bad creator, but I wouldn’t call it a strength either.
jom2003
Well-Known Member
I mean Ace absolute ceiling is like a MPJ, who still wouldn't be anyway near the “best player in the draft”. Maybe for last year.
fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
How many post ups did favors get per game? How many was the average post ups per game in college basketball that season?
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
The more I study Edgecomb the more I’m convinced he’s the second superstar in this draft. I would also call him the second most complete player in this draft.
I’m guessing he’s the best athlete in the draft since at least Ant, and my biggest thing with him is his drive and how he competes.
I recognize that Harper is widely recognized as the #2 prospect, and truthfully I don’t know his game that well so I can’t just arbitrarily put him ahead of Harper, but if the Jazz get the second pick and take VJ, I won’t complain. Am I crazy?
@Saint Cy of JFC or someone that knows Harper’s game describe it for me?
I’m guessing he’s the best athlete in the draft since at least Ant, and my biggest thing with him is his drive and how he competes.
I recognize that Harper is widely recognized as the #2 prospect, and truthfully I don’t know his game that well so I can’t just arbitrarily put him ahead of Harper, but if the Jazz get the second pick and take VJ, I won’t complain. Am I crazy?
@Saint Cy of JFC or someone that knows Harper’s game describe it for me?
jom2003
Well-Known Member
Yeah but just barely. Like “hitting on Grayson Allen” with the 21 the pick in 2018 but when in reality, that 2018 class was so deep that if you are to do a redraft, Allen would actually be selected after the 21th.
If we do a redraft of 2014 class, I think there's a good chance that Hood would still be there at 23rd cuz they are about roughly 20+ players I'd still take ahead of him in that class.
Good lord you are full of so much ****.
Please produce the list of 21 players you'd take over Grayson Allen in the 2018 draft.
I went through the 2018 draft, and being as unkind as possible to Allen, the absolute lowest he would go in a re-draft is 19.