What's new

For People Who Think Hayward's Decision was Predetermined

And scenario 2 is what happened (essentially), which has been standard of practice when someone loses a max guy. Sure, you can say you're strengthening the competition, but it takes a pretty concrete thinker to not be able to think outside the box enough to see a much bigger picture here.

Please go back and read the thread -- you are missing my argument completely. I'm retorting to those who say Ainge should have given the TPE for nothing. Giving it up for a 2nd is sensible, but we don't know if DL offered this or not.
 
I think we offered a second... we would have to give something in the deal.

Here is the thing you are all seeming to miss... It would have hard capped them. I am not sure they were going to exceed the amount, but I believe that was the bigger issue.
 
Lebron and Bosh in '10 (Miami had the outright cap space)


Old CBA, and the Heat could not execute the deal they wanted without the SNT. So the Cavs had leverage. I think they got 2 firsts and a second for LeBron, but check me on that. I don't remember all the details, but trust me, it is COMPLETELY apples-to-oranges with the Haywood situation.
 
If it is just the gentleman's thing to do to give up a TPE for nothing, then why did Chicago require a 2nd in the Boozer deal? DL had a great relationship with the Bulls front office, why did they screw him by requiring a 2nd?

That is a gentleman's agreement. A late 2nd is worth very little and is just offering back something in good faith. That is generally how it works, it goes both ways.

Its a very safe assumption Jazz would have given up a 2nd for this with Boston but they had no interest in negotiating anything within reason. It was rumored that is what would happen. Obviously all of it is just speculation. Thats just how Ainge works and Hayward had no interest in getting involved at all.
 
I don't love rules that do the opposite of their intention. That's exactly what this hard-cap with SnT's does to the team losing the free agent. **** sucks.
 
Is there really a question of whether DL would trade a second rounder to be able to obtain a $30M TPE? We've ended up selling 2nd rounders for money because we don't use them. And the tangible return to Ainge would get him 1) the ability not only to land a free agent, but pick up a free second rounder for doing so, 2) help his son's campaign, 3) stay in the good graces of Utah should they deal together in the future.

You'd have to be going out of your way to be an *** to look past all that, which is what he appears to have clearly done.

Value of 2nd rounders is not entirely clear. This article puts the value north of $2 million, which is likely a bit high. But it certainly more than $1 million. They expire in 1 year. Is there any trade that DL had in mind to burn up to $30M this past year? They have cap space to make all the moves they made, so it would have to be a trade for a high-value contract player. Would they have traded for PG13 in an imbalanced trade if they had the TPE? If there was not a realistic trade for a big contract player. not, why give up the pick? Again, all the talk about DL being willing to offer a 2nd and Ainge unwilling to do the deal is what you guys want to believe is true. But it seems to me to be an unsubstantiated guess. Prove me wrong, find a quote and a source and I'll eat crow.

How does Ainge doing a SNT for a 2nd rounder give Ainge the ability to land a free agent? That is news to me, but there are strange things in the CBA that I don't understand, so please educate me.
 
He doesn't have half the personality and charisma that Mitchell has shown in his rookie season.
Enjoy Boston Haywood, the competition is getting rough over there...
 
Value of 2nd rounders is not entirely clear. This article puts the value north of $2 million, which is likely a bit high. But it certainly more than $1 million. They expire in 1 year. Is there any trade that DL had in mind to burn up to $30M this past year? They have cap space to make all the moves they made, so it would have to be a trade for a high-value contract player. Would they have traded for PG13 in an imbalanced trade if they had the TPE? If there was not a realistic trade for a big contract player. not, why give up the pick? Again, all the talk about DL being willing to offer a 2nd and Ainge unwilling to do the deal is what you guys want to believe is true. But it seems to me to be an unsubstantiated guess. Prove me wrong, find a quote and a source and I'll eat crow.

How does Ainge doing a SNT for a 2nd rounder give Ainge the ability to land a free agent? That is news to me, but there are strange things in the CBA that I don't understand, so please educate me.
Regarding DL giving up a second rounder for a $30M TPE... yeah, not much evidence out there for that, similar to this:

https://www.bmj.com/content/327/7429/1459
 
He doesn't have half the personality and charisma that Mitchell has shown in his rookie season.
Enjoy Boston Haywood, the competition is getting rough over there...

Uh, Boston is set up now to become the most stacked team in the NBA ever. Haywood might win a ring from behind the bench.
 
Thanks for confirming that you've got nothing to back up your hypothesis.

How would you have used the $30M TPE? An imbalanced trade for CP3? For PG13? There were so many options out there.
Over the next couple years we have all our second rounders plus two from other teams. If you’re really suggesting that we don’t know if DL would be willing to trade one for a $30M TPE because we don’t have any evidence for it, that’d be as silly as saying we don’t know if DL would be willing to trade Tomic for a first rounder because we don’t have any evidence to suggest he would.

If common sense isn’t good enough to deduce that DL would trade a second rounder for a $30M TPE, then you may as well shut down this entire site and we can stop talking about anything.

Would DL trade our second rounder this year for a first rounder? I dunno. I don’t have any evidence that says he would if he could.
 
Back
Top