What's new
By:

Former Jazz players around the league

Tremendous Upside said:
Let's give $12 million per year to a non-shooting 9th man who also can't make a layup, clogs up the lane and is an overrated defender.

Never change, Lakers.

www.espn.com

Sources: Lakers give Vanderbilt 4-year extension

After helping the Lakers' push into the Western Conference finals, Jarred Vanderbilt has agreed to a four-year, $48 million extension, sources told ESPN.
www.espn.com www.espn.com
Click to expand...
Happy for Vando but ooofff if that is the number I wait until the offseason to pay him as FA. Only give extensions to non-stars at a discount.
 
The Vanderbilt stuff still perplexes me to a degree.

He rates out pretty well on some advanced defensive stats, at worst average, but he seemed below average to me on the Jazz. Nearly every other person outside of Jazz fans disagrees with that tho and Lakers fans seemed to like him, so maybe I was just a Vando hater.

Offensively I doubt he ever amounts to much, but he showed some wide open spot up ability that has some upside if he continues to get better.

tldr: I dont think he is worth MLE money, but I think 75% of the NBA probably does, so it's probably a solid deal.
 
Saint Cy of JFC said:
The Vanderbilt stuff still perplexes me to a degree.

He rates out pretty well on some advanced defensive stats, at worst average, but he seemed below average to me on the Jazz. Nearly every other person outside of Jazz fans disagrees with that tho and Lakers fans seemed to like him, so maybe I was just a Vando hater.
Click to expand...

Once again, Vando is fine if you're a team that can afford to have a guy out there whose only function is to hunt for loose balls and offensive rebounds. In other words, he has to play with 4 shooters/scorers. That's the situation he had in Minny and he looked way better than he is as a consequence.

If you're expecting him to carry any kind of an offensive load or stop guys the same size as him, you're going to be disappointed.

Apparently LeGM likes him, though, and that's all that matters in LA.
 
I don't think the 12m a year is the worst part with the projected cap spike, but the 4 years is the bad thing at a contract that should only be worth It If the guy adds at least one corner 3 to his offensive arsenal (yet in his five seasons he not only failed to shoot threes, but also never had a season shooting above 70% from the line)
 
Last edited:
Tremendous Upside said:
Once again, Vando is fine if you're a team that can afford to have a guy out there whose only function is to hunt for loose balls and offensive rebounds. In other words, he has to play with 4 shooters/scorers. That's the situation he had in Minny and he looked way better than he is as a consequence.

If you're expecting him to carry any kind of an offensive load or stop guys the same size as him, you're going to be disappointed.

Apparently LeGM likes him, though, and that's all that matters in LA.
Click to expand...
You're still just commenting on offense. I know what he is offensively. My issue with him in Utah is that the defense never seemed as good as advertised.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top